2.9 sec in total
477 ms
1.9 sec
513 ms
Visit timberdesign.org.uk now to see the best up-to-date Timber Design content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about timberdesign.org.uk
Our multi-award winning company undertake a wide range of oak building projects, from oak porches and oak garages, oak conservatories to oak extensions.
Visit timberdesign.org.ukWe analyzed Timberdesign.org.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 477 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
timberdesign.org.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value4.7 s
69/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value3.7 s
90/100
10%
477 ms
43 ms
127 ms
353 ms
23 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Timberdesign.org.uk, 18% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (624 ms) belongs to the original domain Timberdesign.org.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 337.7 kB (21%)
1.6 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Timberdesign.org.uk main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 223.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 223.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 114.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Timber Design images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
We found no issues to fix!
25
25
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Timber Design. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
timberdesign.org.uk
477 ms
css
43 ms
timber_logo@2x.png
127 ms
TDC-twisted-oak-homepage-1.jpg
353 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf
23 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf
44 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf
51 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0C4n.ttf
56 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf
56 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf
56 ms
lazyload.min.js
166 ms
modules.woff
284 ms
Oak-Extensions.png
376 ms
Oak-Buildings.png
275 ms
Oak-Orangeries.png
529 ms
Craftsmanship.png
234 ms
Reliabitly.png
235 ms
Straightforward.png
314 ms
Sustainable.png
313 ms
Initial-Contacticon.png
339 ms
Designicon.png
348 ms
Estimatingicon.png
393 ms
saw_icon.png
393 ms
The-Buildicon.png
417 ms
100-square-meters-extension-in-Laurencekirk-9.jpg
425 ms
Extension-in-Carmillie-11.jpg
453 ms
Extension-over-Ascreavie-2.jpg
624 ms
award_01.png
548 ms
award_02.png
493 ms
award_03.png
501 ms
award_04.png
531 ms
award_05.png
571 ms
Outstanding-Oak-Buildings-in-Scotland.png
579 ms
timberdesign.org.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
timberdesign.org.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
timberdesign.org.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Timberdesign.org.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Timberdesign.org.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
timberdesign.org.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Timber Design. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: