Tools & Wizards About Us
time-technology.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

time-technology.co.uk

Salesforce Consultants for Non-profits | Certified Partner | Time Technology

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

543 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

764 ms

time-technology.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit time-technology.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Time Technology content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about time-technology.co.uk

As a Certified Salesforce Partner, Time Technology provides Non-profits with Salesforce solutions, consultancy, and management services. Find out how we can transform your Nonprofit Organisation here.

Visit time-technology.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Time-technology.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 543 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

time-technology.co.uk performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.8 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,220 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

time-technology.co.uk

543 ms

time-technology.com

536 ms

hu-banner.min.js

245 ms

style.min.css

79 ms

theme.min.css

157 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Time-technology.co.uk, 92% (81 requests) were made to Time-technology.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (944 ms) relates to the external source Time-technology.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 122.1 kB (16%)

Content Size

776.1 kB

After Optimization

654.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Time-technology.co.uk main page is 776.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 295.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 115.7 kB

  • Original 140.4 kB
  • After minification 135.6 kB
  • After compression 24.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 49 B

  • Original 215.3 kB
  • After minification 215.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Time Technology images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 295.7 kB
  • After minification 295.7 kB
  • After compression 290.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 124.7 kB
  • After minification 124.4 kB
  • After compression 123.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Time-technology.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (80%)

Requests Now

85

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Time Technology. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

time-technology.co.uk

time-technology.co.uk

543 ms

time-technology.com

time-technology.com

536 ms

hu-banner.min.js

hu-banner.min.js

245 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

79 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

157 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

231 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

461 ms

post-44.css

post-44.css

233 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

310 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

313 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

235 ms

nicons.css

nicons.css

307 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

639 ms

post-6.css

post-6.css

315 ms

post-64.css

post-64.css

385 ms

post-166.css

post-166.css

390 ms

style.css

style.css

391 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

476 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

466 ms

js

js

91 ms

js

js

139 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

474 ms

widget-carousel.min.css

widget-carousel.min.css

553 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

534 ms

gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css

gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css

534 ms

gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css

gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css

561 ms

gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css

gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css

917 ms

basic.min.css

basic.min.css

821 ms

theme-ie11.min.css

theme-ie11.min.css

813 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

820 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

822 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

821 ms

googlesitekit-consent-mode-3d6495dceaebc28bcca3.js

googlesitekit-consent-mode-3d6495dceaebc28bcca3.js

822 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

944 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

822 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

824 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

823 ms

jquery.resize.min.js

jquery.resize.min.js

824 ms

TweenMax.min.js

TweenMax.min.js

47 ms

infinite-scroll.pkgd.min.js

infinite-scroll.pkgd.min.js

942 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

876 ms

filtery.min.js

filtery.min.js

797 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

693 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

783 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

887 ms

css

css

51 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

709 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

707 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

705 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

701 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

659 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

665 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

654 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

587 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

589 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

685 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

681 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

624 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

625 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

607 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

643 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

594 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

579 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

411 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

410 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

405 ms

parallax-gallery.min.js

parallax-gallery.min.js

472 ms

parallax-element.min.js

parallax-element.min.js

473 ms

jquery.visible.min.js

jquery.visible.min.js

473 ms

parallax-background.min.js

parallax-background.min.js

472 ms

hotips.min.js

hotips.min.js

472 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

471 ms

homehero.jpg

homehero.jpg

537 ms

font

font

118 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

606 ms

helpbackground.jpg

helpbackground.jpg

416 ms

logo.png

logo.png

79 ms

icon-phone.png

icon-phone.png

78 ms

F28637C4-C9E9-4CA8-918F2DCBBF843349.jpg

F28637C4-C9E9-4CA8-918F2DCBBF843349.jpg

81 ms

OrgPartnerHorizontal-WithBorder.png

OrgPartnerHorizontal-WithBorder.png

104 ms

salesforce-services-png.png

salesforce-services-png.png

105 ms

salesforce-for-np-png.png

salesforce-for-np-png.png

154 ms

salesforce-support3.png

salesforce-support3.png

155 ms

management-of-change-png.png

management-of-change-png.png

156 ms

7DRdgXFd_400x400.jpg

7DRdgXFd_400x400.jpg

157 ms

Mailchimp2Salesforce-1.jpg

Mailchimp2Salesforce-1.jpg

167 ms

mailchimp-for-salesforce-e1720126383360.png

mailchimp-for-salesforce-e1720126383360.png

168 ms

salesforce.png

salesforce.png

230 ms

Accessibility Review

time-technology.co.uk accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

time-technology.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

time-technology.co.uk SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Time-technology.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Time-technology.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

time-technology.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Time Technology. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: