7.5 sec in total
2.9 sec
4.4 sec
200 ms
Welcome to timesharechoice.com homepage info - get ready to check Timesharechoice best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about timesharechoice.com
Visit timesharechoice.comWe analyzed Timesharechoice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.9 sec and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
timesharechoice.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value6.7 s
7/100
25%
Value4.8 s
68/100
10%
Value1,070 ms
25/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
2940 ms
173 ms
145 ms
167 ms
443 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Timesharechoice.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Timesharechoice.com.
Page size can be reduced by 573.9 kB (61%)
935.4 kB
361.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Timesharechoice.com main page is 935.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 401.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 208.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 38.6 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 208.9 kB or 93% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Timesharechoice images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 249.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 249.0 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 109.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Timesharechoice.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 109.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (69%)
86
27
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Timesharechoice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
timesharechoice.com
2940 ms
searchforms.css
173 ms
nextgen_gallery_related_images.css
145 ms
styles.css
167 ms
style.css
443 ms
blue.css
189 ms
jquery-ui.css
369 ms
jquery.qtip.min.css
231 ms
text-hover.css
235 ms
slimbox2.css
246 ms
jquery.js
526 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
318 ms
ajax.js
264 ms
itro-scripts.js
337 ms
lightbox_context.js
338 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
418 ms
core.min.js
412 ms
widget.min.js
414 ms
mouse.min.js
457 ms
slider.min.js
496 ms
jquery.tinynav.js
520 ms
jquery.footable.js
580 ms
jquery.selectBox.min.js
519 ms
easing.js
557 ms
jcarousellite.min.js
554 ms
theme-scripts.js
557 ms
slimbox2.js
602 ms
slimbox2_autoload.js
636 ms
adsbygoogle.js
5 ms
seal.js
244 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
521 ms
jquery.form.min.js
298 ms
scripts.js
297 ms
position.min.js
299 ms
menu.min.js
330 ms
autocomplete.min.js
481 ms
jquery.qtip.min.js
480 ms
text-hover.js
479 ms
468x60-banner.jpg
202 ms
Marriott-Ko-Olina.jpg
200 ms
atlantis.jpg
201 ms
maui-ocean.jpg
264 ms
aruba.jpg
264 ms
Westin.jpg
265 ms
newport-coast.jpg
264 ms
bbb-A-.png
263 ms
CSATravelProtection-1.png
263 ms
no-thumb-75.jpg
656 ms
324468-75x75.jpg
656 ms
likeus_facebook.png
795 ms
google-plus.png
655 ms
twitter.png
615 ms
facebook.png
616 ms
indesign.png
654 ms
fbevents.js
197 ms
icon_rss.gif
652 ms
waterbackground.jpg
765 ms
content_botbg.gif
689 ms
ca-pub-6460265331554167.js
229 ms
zrt_lookup.html
220 ms
show_ads_impl.js
154 ms
block_topbg.gif
643 ms
seal_image.php
558 ms
tab_bg.gif
536 ms
price-tag-head.png
600 ms
search_btn.jpg
591 ms
402 ms
osd.js
11 ms
analytics.js
343 ms
sb-arrow.png
206 ms
tab_activebg.gif
209 ms
ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png
244 ms
ui-bg_highlight-soft_75_cccccc_1x100.png
245 ms
ui-bg_glass_75_e6e6e6_1x400.png
243 ms
ads
162 ms
collect
27 ms
m_js_controller.js
27 ms
abg.js
42 ms
favicon
54 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
60 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
23 ms
s
20 ms
x_button_blue2.png
10 ms
iubenda.js
9 ms
roundtrip.js
8 ms
ui
45 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
19 ms
iubenda_i_badge.css
19 ms
AXO7T3SAM5CZXCLQI6Y5TH.js
187 ms
timesharechoice.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
timesharechoice.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
timesharechoice.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Timesharechoice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Timesharechoice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
timesharechoice.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Timesharechoice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: