Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

timetocharm.com

Geniune Italian Charms

Page Load Speed

5.8 sec in total

First Response

785 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

892 ms

timetocharm.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to timetocharm.com homepage info - get ready to check Timetocharm best content right away, or after learning these important things about timetocharm.com

Exclusive Italian Charms, Memory lockets, Floating charms, Pandora Style Beads, dog charms, charm bracelets, watches and accessories

Visit timetocharm.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Timetocharm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 785 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

timetocharm.com performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

50/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.075

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.7 s

80/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.timetocharm.com

785 ms

common.css

124 ms

border.css

128 ms

layout.css

191 ms

input.css

187 ms

Our browser made a total of 134 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (122 requests) were addressed to the original Timetocharm.com, 1% (2 requests) were made to Rapidscansecure.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Verify.authorize.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Timetocharm.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 393.3 kB (73%)

Content Size

540.7 kB

After Optimization

147.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Timetocharm.com main page is 540.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 353.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 80.4 kB

  • Original 91.6 kB
  • After minification 91.3 kB
  • After compression 11.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.4 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 32.3 kB
  • After minification 30.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Timetocharm images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 261.0 kB

  • Original 353.5 kB
  • After minification 281.0 kB
  • After compression 92.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 261.0 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 50.1 kB

  • Original 63.4 kB
  • After minification 56.3 kB
  • After compression 13.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Timetocharm.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (44%)

Requests Now

131

After Optimization

74

The browser has sent 131 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Timetocharm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

timetocharm.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

timetocharm.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

timetocharm.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Timetocharm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Timetocharm.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Timetocharm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: