Tools & Wizards About Us
timinginfo.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

timinginfo.com

Latest Blogs on Technology, social media and Internet |Timinginfo.com

Page Load Speed

9.2 sec in total

First Response

2 sec

Resources Loaded

6.8 sec

Page Rendered

400 ms

timinginfo.com screenshot

About Website

Visit timinginfo.com now to see the best up-to-date Timinginfo content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about timinginfo.com

We provide latest blogs on design development, networking, online marketing, technology and social media. Visit our website for latest blogs.

Visit timinginfo.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Timinginfo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

timinginfo.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value830 ms

35/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.0 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

timinginfo.com

2006 ms

styles.css

403 ms

intlTelInput.min.css

435 ms

countrySelect.min.css

447 ms

style.css

178 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Timinginfo.com, 21% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Timinginfo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 531.6 kB (45%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

653.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Timinginfo.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 415.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 365.9 kB

  • Original 415.4 kB
  • After minification 380.7 kB
  • After compression 49.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 365.9 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 107.1 kB
  • After minification 107.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Timinginfo images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 38.2 kB

  • Original 400.2 kB
  • After minification 400.2 kB
  • After compression 362.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 127.6 kB

  • Original 262.4 kB
  • After minification 262.4 kB
  • After compression 134.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Timinginfo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 127.6 kB or 49% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (86%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Timinginfo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

timinginfo.com

timinginfo.com

2006 ms

styles.css

styles.css

403 ms

intlTelInput.min.css

intlTelInput.min.css

435 ms

countrySelect.min.css

countrySelect.min.css

447 ms

style.css

style.css

178 ms

css

css

27 ms

style.css

style.css

170 ms

td_legacy_main.css

td_legacy_main.css

326 ms

td_standard_pack_main.css

td_standard_pack_main.css

336 ms

tdb_main.css

tdb_main.css

361 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

485 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

498 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

450 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

450 ms

index.js

index.js

451 ms

index.js

index.js

451 ms

intlTelInput.min.js

intlTelInput.min.js

452 ms

countrySelect.min.js

countrySelect.min.js

465 ms

tagdiv_theme.min.js

tagdiv_theme.min.js

505 ms

tdPostImages.js

tdPostImages.js

718 ms

tdSocialSharing.js

tdSocialSharing.js

718 ms

tdModalPostImages.js

tdModalPostImages.js

717 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

717 ms

api.js

api.js

36 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

718 ms

index.js

index.js

716 ms

js_files_for_front.min.js

js_files_for_front.min.js

911 ms

tdLoadingBox.js

tdLoadingBox.js

909 ms

tdbMenu.js

tdbMenu.js

910 ms

tdToTop.js

tdToTop.js

911 ms

tdAjaxSearch.js

tdAjaxSearch.js

910 ms

tdbSearch.js

tdbSearch.js

910 ms

tdInfiniteLoader.js

tdInfiniteLoader.js

1006 ms

tdSmartSidebar.js

tdSmartSidebar.js

1006 ms

timinginfo-scaled.jpg

timinginfo-scaled.jpg

624 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

60 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

60 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

253 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

256 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

257 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

257 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

256 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQUwaEQXjM.woff

256 ms

MwQ5bhbm2POE2V9BO7h5uGM.woff

MwQ5bhbm2POE2V9BO7h5uGM.woff

255 ms

newspaper.woff

newspaper.woff

656 ms

timinginfo.com

timinginfo.com

1310 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

73 ms

anchor

anchor

33 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

4 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

11 ms

sr2BvsM2R_OZKHX83mSXJ8YBPDmTxOV2dVCuSpL6Gdo.js

sr2BvsM2R_OZKHX83mSXJ8YBPDmTxOV2dVCuSpL6Gdo.js

34 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

65 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

20 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

31 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

32 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

32 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

10 ms

Accessibility Review

timinginfo.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

timinginfo.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

timinginfo.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Timinginfo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Timinginfo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

timinginfo.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Timinginfo. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: