Tools & Wizards About Us
tinkerlytics.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 99

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 96% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

tinkerlytics.com

Digital Marketing Services - SEO, SEM, Copy, Analytics

Page Load Speed

10 sec in total

First Response

184 ms

Resources Loaded

9.2 sec

Page Rendered

625 ms

tinkerlytics.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Tinkerlytics content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tinkerlytics.com

Get your website to work harder. Digital marketing services that can help you communicate to customers and rank higher in search engines.

Visit tinkerlytics.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tinkerlytics.com page load time and found that the first response time was 184 ms and then it took 9.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tinkerlytics.com performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

86/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

86/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.5 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value440 ms

64/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.019

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.2 s

74/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tinkerlytics.com

184 ms

tinkerlytics.com

8215 ms

frontend.min.css

277 ms

css

32 ms

style.min.css

433 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Tinkerlytics.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Tinkerlytics.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 164.5 kB (58%)

Content Size

285.6 kB

After Optimization

121.1 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tinkerlytics.com main page is 285.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 170.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 139.6 kB

  • Original 170.3 kB
  • After minification 168.1 kB
  • After compression 30.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 139.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 17.5 kB

  • Original 75.5 kB
  • After minification 75.5 kB
  • After compression 58.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 17.5 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 39.8 kB
  • After minification 39.8 kB
  • After compression 32.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tinkerlytics.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.3 kB or 18% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (91%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tinkerlytics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

tinkerlytics.com

tinkerlytics.com

184 ms

tinkerlytics.com

tinkerlytics.com

8215 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

277 ms

css

css

32 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

433 ms

style.css

style.css

268 ms

uag-css-794.css

uag-css-794.css

381 ms

style-blocks-posts.css

style-blocks-posts.css

291 ms

style-blocks-advanced-form.css

style-blocks-advanced-form.css

375 ms

style-blocks-rowlayout.css

style-blocks-rowlayout.css

318 ms

style-blocks-column.css

style-blocks-column.css

358 ms

analytics-talk-content-tracking.js

analytics-talk-content-tracking.js

396 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

488 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

638 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

566 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

565 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

723 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

563 ms

main.js

main.js

636 ms

gtm4wp-contact-form-7-tracker.js

gtm4wp-contact-form-7-tracker.js

666 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

664 ms

kb-advanced-form-block.min.js

kb-advanced-form-block.min.js

700 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

126 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

69 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

71 ms

astra.woff

astra.woff

113 ms

js

js

63 ms

Accessibility Review

tinkerlytics.com accessibility score

99

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

tinkerlytics.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

tinkerlytics.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tinkerlytics.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tinkerlytics.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tinkerlytics.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: