Tools & Wizards About Us
tinneytool.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

tinneytool.com

Machine Shop | United States | Tinney Tool & Machine Co., Inc.

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

160 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

56 ms

tinneytool.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Tinney Tool content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tinneytool.com

Proudly Machining Precision Parts In America For Over 22 years. Contact Us Today To See What Makes Tinney Tool Different!

Visit tinneytool.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tinneytool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 160 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tinneytool.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.1 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,600 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.04

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.4 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.tinneytool.com

160 ms

minified.js

39 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

84 ms

polyfill.min.js

1190 ms

thunderbolt-commons.60ed9a5a.bundle.min.js

65 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Tinneytool.com, 41% (19 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 26% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 408.1 kB (51%)

Content Size

807.4 kB

After Optimization

399.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Tinneytool.com main page is 807.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 481.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 356.7 kB

  • Original 481.3 kB
  • After minification 479.5 kB
  • After compression 124.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 356.7 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 36.6 kB
  • After minification 34.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tinney Tool images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 48.7 kB

  • Original 289.5 kB
  • After minification 289.4 kB
  • After compression 240.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.7 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (38%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tinney Tool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.tinneytool.com

www.tinneytool.com

160 ms

minified.js

minified.js

39 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

84 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

1190 ms

thunderbolt-commons.60ed9a5a.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.60ed9a5a.bundle.min.js

65 ms

main.dda15fae.bundle.min.js

main.dda15fae.bundle.min.js

66 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

64 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

68 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

68 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

68 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

67 ms

f649ba_43c594bf64544593ae8ea8115034442b.jpg

f649ba_43c594bf64544593ae8ea8115034442b.jpg

319 ms

f649ba_826b08bc9a15487f8cbd88f2111895e6.png

f649ba_826b08bc9a15487f8cbd88f2111895e6.png

569 ms

f649ba_741c9c5d9b96405b9d2ddac60a26b9dcf000.jpg

f649ba_741c9c5d9b96405b9d2ddac60a26b9dcf000.jpg

733 ms

5c17a3f4fffb44a38f9e087e1793bd0c.png

5c17a3f4fffb44a38f9e087e1793bd0c.png

410 ms

f43cb85404b54190be558c08e1d47300.png

f43cb85404b54190be558c08e1d47300.png

445 ms

a60b901325f94c82b7366ec0927c04b0.png

a60b901325f94c82b7366ec0927c04b0.png

446 ms

NTMA-Side-Tag.jpg

NTMA-Side-Tag.jpg

590 ms

f649ba_687d4a46421c4a92ada1bb75cbfde217.png

f649ba_687d4a46421c4a92ada1bb75cbfde217.png

641 ms

f649ba_2fbd9c533e404482b2614d7dafcda95b.png

f649ba_2fbd9c533e404482b2614d7dafcda95b.png

655 ms

f649ba_64439c260f7544bda300b00d8321e224.png

f649ba_64439c260f7544bda300b00d8321e224.png

749 ms

f649ba_198ca0c9353542f7a5a5b2caf9a2627d.png

f649ba_198ca0c9353542f7a5a5b2caf9a2627d.png

796 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

36 ms

e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff

e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff

34 ms

4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff

4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff

34 ms

b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff

b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff

34 ms

6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff

6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff

34 ms

116 ms

110 ms

109 ms

106 ms

106 ms

108 ms

153 ms

155 ms

151 ms

148 ms

148 ms

147 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

4 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

21 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

5 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

17 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

4 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

4 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

4 ms

Accessibility Review

tinneytool.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

tinneytool.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

tinneytool.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tinneytool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tinneytool.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tinneytool.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tinney Tool. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: