Tools & Wizards About Us
tinywaterblog.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 93

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

tinywaterblog.com

Napa & San Francisco Wedding Photography Blog

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

265 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

645 ms

tinywaterblog.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Tinywater Blog content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tinywaterblog.com

Uniquely offbeat creative wedding photographer duo based in the San Francisco Bay Area serving Napa, Sonoma and destinations.

Visit tinywaterblog.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tinywaterblog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 265 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tinywaterblog.com performance score

93

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

90/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

78/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.022

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tinywaterblog.com

265 ms

tinywaterblog.com

346 ms

style.css

291 ms

style.css

312 ms

style.css

581 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Tinywaterblog.com, 2% (1 request) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Tinywaterblog.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 66.5 kB (17%)

Content Size

393.0 kB

After Optimization

326.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Tinywaterblog.com main page is 393.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 351.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 31.4 kB

  • Original 38.7 kB
  • After minification 32.2 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.5 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 35.1 kB

  • Original 351.5 kB
  • After minification 316.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tinywater Blog images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 15 B

  • Original 2.8 kB
  • After minification 2.8 kB
  • After compression 2.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (22%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

32

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tinywater Blog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

tinywaterblog.com

tinywaterblog.com

265 ms

tinywaterblog.com

tinywaterblog.com

346 ms

style.css

style.css

291 ms

style.css

style.css

312 ms

style.css

style.css

581 ms

style.css

style.css

604 ms

core.css.php

core.css.php

685 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

19 ms

pagenotfound

pagenotfound

103 ms

bg-pattern.png

bg-pattern.png

288 ms

navigation-bg.png

navigation-bg.png

298 ms

nav-home.png

nav-home.png

290 ms

nav-about.png

nav-about.png

306 ms

nav-categories.png

nav-categories.png

299 ms

nav-contact.png

nav-contact.png

299 ms

nav-we-love.png

nav-we-love.png

594 ms

nav-rss.png

nav-rss.png

574 ms

canvas-bg.png

canvas-bg.png

580 ms

688 ms

energy-casino.png

energy-casino.png

692 ms

supporters-banner.gif

supporters-banner.gif

594 ms

1278389360.png

1278389360.png

1017 ms

1268953359.gif

1268953359.gif

862 ms

1268953511.jpg

1268953511.jpg

897 ms

1268953260.jpg

1268953260.jpg

891 ms

1279381780.png

1279381780.png

1067 ms

1297130960.jpg

1297130960.jpg

981 ms

1305225545.jpg

1305225545.jpg

1159 ms

1269384462.png

1269384462.png

1184 ms

1296877849.png

1296877849.png

1299 ms

1278389692.gif

1278389692.gif

1283 ms

1278389741.gif

1278389741.gif

1310 ms

1296877906.png

1296877906.png

1500 ms

bottom-banner.gif

bottom-banner.gif

1457 ms

blogsneakpeek.png

blogsneakpeek.png

1600 ms

trans_bg.png

trans_bg.png

1554 ms

sneak_peak.png

sneak_peak.png

1569 ms

recent-tweet-bg.gif

recent-tweet-bg.gif

1600 ms

title-background.png

title-background.png

1745 ms

comments.png

comments.png

1771 ms

tell-a-friend.png

tell-a-friend.png

1842 ms

link-to-this.png

link-to-this.png

1864 ms

dotted-line.gif

dotted-line.gif

1676 ms

footer-bg.png

footer-bg.png

1877 ms

Accessibility Review

tinywaterblog.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

tinywaterblog.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

tinywaterblog.com SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tinywaterblog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tinywaterblog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tinywaterblog.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tinywater Blog. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: