7.3 sec in total
2.3 sec
4.9 sec
141 ms
Click here to check amazing Titanium Properties content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about titaniumproperties.eu
Visit titaniumproperties.euWe analyzed Titaniumproperties.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
titaniumproperties.eu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.5 s
0/100
10%
Value21.2 s
0/100
25%
Value17.0 s
0/100
10%
Value210 ms
88/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value21.0 s
1/100
10%
2297 ms
442 ms
323 ms
327 ms
645 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Titaniumproperties.eu, 11% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source Titaniumproperties.es.
Page size can be reduced by 2.6 MB (76%)
3.4 MB
811.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Titaniumproperties.eu main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 90.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.0 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Titanium Properties images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Titaniumproperties.eu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (87%)
79
10
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Titanium Properties. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
2297 ms
style.min.css
442 ms
style.min.css
323 ms
style.min.css
327 ms
bootstrap.min.css
645 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
440 ms
style.css
1004 ms
my_media.css
763 ms
css
37 ms
all.min.css
751 ms
fontello.min.css
554 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
561 ms
leaflet.css
707 ms
MarkerCluster.css
680 ms
MarkerCluster.Default.css
753 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
819 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
1047 ms
swiper.min.css
915 ms
post-5.css
870 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
897 ms
global.css
1019 ms
post-25936.css
988 ms
css
34 ms
css
35 ms
jquery.min.js
1135 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1057 ms
language-cookie.js
1126 ms
modernizr.custom.62456.js
1114 ms
css
17 ms
post-21801.css
1027 ms
post-21805.css
1119 ms
post-25940.css
1119 ms
rs6.css
1181 ms
rbtools.min.js
1227 ms
rs6.min.js
1523 ms
core.min.js
1189 ms
mouse.min.js
1180 ms
draggable.min.js
1212 ms
menu.min.js
1290 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1326 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1310 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1117 ms
dom-ready.min.js
1111 ms
hooks.min.js
1066 ms
i18n.min.js
1093 ms
a11y.min.js
995 ms
autocomplete.min.js
983 ms
slider.min.js
906 ms
datepicker.min.js
975 ms
bootstrap.min.js
952 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
912 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
909 ms
dense.min.js
916 ms
placeholders.min.js
913 ms
slideout.min.js
897 ms
datepicker-es.js
879 ms
leaflet.js
916 ms
leaflet.markercluster.js
795 ms
mapfunctions.js
930 ms
maps_base.js
828 ms
google_map_code.js
825 ms
slick.min.js
843 ms
control.js
844 ms
ajaxcalls.js
952 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
838 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
804 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
821 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
30 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxM.woff
55 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
73 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc-.woff
75 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
75 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff
74 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
74 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc-.woff
73 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
74 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
883 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff
41 ms
frontend.min.js
796 ms
waypoints.min.js
784 ms
frontend.min.js
872 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
839 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
1030 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
843 ms
logo.png
850 ms
logo1.svg
854 ms
dummy.png
863 ms
TITANIUM.jpg
1004 ms
experience-1.jpg
855 ms
SALE.jpg
839 ms
es.png
864 ms
gb.png
867 ms
titaniumproperties.eu accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
titaniumproperties.eu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
titaniumproperties.eu SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Titaniumproperties.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Titaniumproperties.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
titaniumproperties.eu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Titanium Properties. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: