Report Summary

  • 89

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

Page Load Speed

5.7 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

229 ms

toff.in screenshot

About Website

Visit toff.in now to see the best up-to-date Toff content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about toff.in

Visit toff.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Toff.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

toff.in performance score

89

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

77/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.014

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

toff.in

1561 ms

grid.css

170 ms

style.css

267 ms

camera.css

185 ms

owl-carousel.css

188 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Toff.in, 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Toff.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 38.2 kB (81%)

Content Size

47.0 kB

After Optimization

8.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Toff.in main page is 47.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 23.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 19.9 kB

  • Original 23.3 kB
  • After minification 16.9 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.4 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 18.3 kB

  • Original 23.7 kB
  • After minification 23.7 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Toff.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.3 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (70%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Toff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

toff.in accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

toff.in best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

toff.in SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Toff.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Toff.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Toff. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: