2.5 sec in total
120 ms
1.6 sec
772 ms
Welcome to tog.ink homepage info - get ready to check TOG best content right away, or after learning these important things about tog.ink
You know design, we know print. TOG.ink brings specialty print processes like digital print, foil stamping, letterpress and thermography to your fingertips.
Visit tog.inkWe analyzed Tog.ink page load time and found that the first response time was 120 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
tog.ink performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.5 s
0/100
10%
Value20.7 s
0/100
25%
Value25.0 s
0/100
10%
Value210 ms
89/100
30%
Value0.162
72/100
15%
Value22.1 s
1/100
10%
120 ms
585 ms
290 ms
223 ms
130 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (89 requests) were addressed to the original Tog.ink, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (585 ms) belongs to the original domain Tog.ink.
Page size can be reduced by 95.5 kB (75%)
126.6 kB
31.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Tog.ink main page is 126.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 110.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 94.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.2 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. TOG images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 782 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 782 B or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 507 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tog.ink needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 507 B or 20% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (43%)
86
49
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TOG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tog.ink
120 ms
tog.ink
585 ms
bootstrap.css
290 ms
all.css
223 ms
slideshow.css
130 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
131 ms
jcarousel.responsive.css
134 ms
main.css
169 ms
header.css
172 ms
footer.css
179 ms
menu.css
211 ms
dd.css
212 ms
style_responsivetogdesigner.css
227 ms
jquery-lastversion.js
419 ms
bootstrap.bundle.js
416 ms
browse.js
264 ms
jquery-ui.js
582 ms
jquery.slideshow.lite-0.5.3.js
303 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
325 ms
jquery.idTabs.min.js
341 ms
jquery.form.js
365 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.js
381 ms
jquery.textfill.js
402 ms
jquery.imgfill.js
404 ms
command.js
421 ms
jquery.ui.cceasy.autocomplete.js
444 ms
ccsite.js
442 ms
jq_utils.js
455 ms
menu.js
456 ms
header.js
459 ms
uncompressed.jquery.dd.js
480 ms
IBDjscript.js
486 ms
autotrack.js
525 ms
js
70 ms
jquery-ui.css
368 ms
css
30 ms
togdesignerFix.css
229 ms
home_wedding_body.js
228 ms
jquery.blockUI.js
172 ms
jquery_selectboxes.js
176 ms
TOG-ink.png
54 ms
TOG-ink-logo.jpg
52 ms
flat-cards-nav-hero-md.jpg
54 ms
flat-cards-nav-hero.jpg
51 ms
folded-cards-nav-hero-md.jpg
50 ms
folded-cards-nav-hero.jpg
50 ms
envelopes-nav-hero-md.jpg
139 ms
envelopes-nav-hero.jpg
143 ms
paper-goodies-nav-hero-md.jpg
140 ms
paper-goodies-nav-hero.jpg
142 ms
gifts-more-nav-hero-md.jpg
141 ms
gifts-more-nav-hero.jpg
144 ms
designer-tools-nav-hero-md.jpg
144 ms
designer-tools-nav-hero.jpg
145 ms
home-banner.jpg
306 ms
home-banner-m.jpg
233 ms
home-foil-process.jpg
231 ms
foil-title.png
227 ms
foil-icon.png
228 ms
home-thermography-process.jpg
229 ms
thermo-title.png
231 ms
thermo-icon.png
231 ms
home-digital-process.jpg
233 ms
digital-title.png
232 ms
digital-icon.png
303 ms
home-enhanced-foil-process.jpg
304 ms
enhanced-foil-title.png
339 ms
enhanced-foil-icon.png
339 ms
home-letterpress-process.jpg
345 ms
letterpress-title.png
338 ms
letterpress-icon.png
338 ms
home-white-ink-process.jpg
338 ms
white-ink-title.png
384 ms
white-ink-icon.png
383 ms
how-it-works-desktop.jpg
385 ms
how-it-works-mobile.jpg
380 ms
GinaPeterson-testimonial.jpg
366 ms
BethLueckStewart-testimonial.jpg
338 ms
LauraBeth-testimonial.jpg
365 ms
product-testimonial.jpg
365 ms
close-check-box.gif
364 ms
js
105 ms
TOGink-small.jpg
299 ms
flag-usa.png
299 ms
flag-canada.png
298 ms
copper-bkg-1-bottom.jpg
299 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
113 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
149 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXx-p7K4GLs.woff
150 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
207 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
219 ms
copper-bkg.jpg
313 ms
paper-bkg.jpg
177 ms
vincentia-webfont.woff
141 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
96 ms
tog.ink accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
tog.ink best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
tog.ink SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tog.ink can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Tog.ink main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
tog.ink
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of TOG. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: