Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

toiletryexpress.co.uk

Toiletry Express - Mini Toiletries - Sprays - Travel Kits

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

29 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

181 ms

toiletryexpress.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Toiletry Express content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about toiletryexpress.co.uk

Toiletry Express - Mini Toiletries - Sprays - Travel Kits, Leading supplier of Toiletries Wholesale, Mini Travel Size Products, Hotel Supplies and Wipes, Sachets, PVC Cosmetic Bags, Travel Toiletry Ba...

Visit toiletryexpress.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Toiletryexpress.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

toiletryexpress.co.uk performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.3 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,270 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.439

21/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.7 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

toiletryexpress.co.uk

29 ms

toiletryexpress.co.uk

189 ms

2ed44d6740d28544e3642528cb7c3d2d.min.css

55 ms

styles-l.min.css

39 ms

settings_default.css

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Toiletryexpress.co.uk, 5% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Chimpstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Chimpstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 267.0 kB (24%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

828.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Toiletryexpress.co.uk main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 799.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 265.3 kB

  • Original 294.0 kB
  • After minification 289.5 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 265.3 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 799.1 kB
  • After minification 799.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Toiletry Express images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 2.9 kB
  • After minification 1.8 kB
  • After compression 1.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.7 kB or 60% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (16%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

51

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Toiletry Express. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

toiletryexpress.co.uk accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Best Practices

toiletryexpress.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

toiletryexpress.co.uk SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Toiletryexpress.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Toiletryexpress.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Toiletry Express. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: