3.9 sec in total
275 ms
2.5 sec
1.1 sec
Visit tom-croft.com now to see the best up-to-date Tom Croft content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tom-croft.com
Professional front and back end web developer - I have 4+ years of experience in design and development and create stunning, secure, and unique websites
Visit tom-croft.comWe analyzed Tom-croft.com page load time and found that the first response time was 275 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
tom-croft.com performance score
275 ms
435 ms
717 ms
757 ms
1601 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Tom-croft.com, 15% (7 requests) were made to Tom-main.b-cdn.net and 8% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Paypal.com.
Page size can be reduced by 905.5 kB (25%)
3.6 MB
2.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Tom-croft.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.8 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 879.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tom Croft needs image optimization as it can save up to 879.4 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 383 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 10.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tom-croft.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.9 kB or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (61%)
36
14
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tom Croft. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tom-croft.com
275 ms
tom-croft.com
435 ms
hotjar-1262126.js
717 ms
l.js
757 ms
pptm.js
1601 ms
js
564 ms
js
755 ms
bootstrap.min.css
649 ms
css2
751 ms
all.css
953 ms
style.css
467 ms
aos.css
751 ms
aos.js
828 ms
email-decode.min.js
527 ms
jquery-3.3.1.min.js
720 ms
popper.min.js
723 ms
bootstrap.min.js
723 ms
analytics.js
364 ms
js
186 ms
modules.f0cd1ed70b545da08b60.js
418 ms
client.js
179 ms
client_default.css
202 ms
conversion_async.js
447 ms
loader.js
375 ms
bg.svg
527 ms
profile.jpg
412 ms
empowerbg-min.jpg
490 ms
bernie.png
425 ms
empower.png
705 ms
caring.png
540 ms
simbg-min.png
703 ms
sim.png
685 ms
hostio.png
607 ms
collect
182 ms
Nexa%20Bold.otf
596 ms
Nexa%20Light.otf
629 ms
rP2Hp2ywxg089UriOZQ.ttf
327 ms
rP2Cp2ywxg089UriAWCrOB8.ttf
384 ms
rP2Cp2ywxg089UriASitOB8.ttf
451 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
229 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
325 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
441 ms
call-tracking_7.js
92 ms
collect
331 ms
box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html
313 ms
261 ms
wcm
268 ms
120 ms
tom-croft.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tom-croft.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tom-croft.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tom-croft.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tom Croft. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: