Tools & Wizards About Us
tomrichmond.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

tomrichmond.com

Richmond Illustration Inc.

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

150 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

199 ms

tomrichmond.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Tom Richmond content for Australia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tomrichmond.com

Minnesota artist specializing in illustrations and caricatures. Store, gallery, blog, biography, client list and contact details.

Visit tomrichmond.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tomrichmond.com page load time and found that the first response time was 150 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tomrichmond.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.234

53/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tomrichmond.com

150 ms

www.tomrichmond.com

810 ms

foundation.css

135 ms

style.css

192 ms

fontawesome.min.css

190 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Tomrichmond.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Stats.wp.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (810 ms) belongs to the original domain Tomrichmond.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 219.7 kB (11%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tomrichmond.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 35.4 kB

  • Original 44.9 kB
  • After minification 43.4 kB
  • After compression 9.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tom Richmond images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 60.4 kB

  • Original 267.6 kB
  • After minification 267.6 kB
  • After compression 207.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 60.4 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 123.9 kB

  • Original 202.2 kB
  • After minification 202.2 kB
  • After compression 78.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tomrichmond.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 123.9 kB or 61% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (80%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tom Richmond. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

tomrichmond.com

tomrichmond.com

150 ms

www.tomrichmond.com

www.tomrichmond.com

810 ms

foundation.css

foundation.css

135 ms

style.css

style.css

192 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

190 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

250 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

185 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

188 ms

style-index.css

style-index.css

197 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

314 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

316 ms

wp-paginate.css

wp-paginate.css

252 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

252 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

265 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

325 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

325 ms

w.js

w.js

13 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

375 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

333 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

387 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

390 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

412 ms

add-to-cart-variation.min.js

add-to-cart-variation.min.js

394 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

413 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

443 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

446 ms

s-202419.js

s-202419.js

12 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

405 ms

foundation.min.js

foundation.min.js

514 ms

modernizr.foundation.js

modernizr.foundation.js

415 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

415 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

457 ms

jquery.tweet.min.js

jquery.tweet.min.js

459 ms

wc-blocks.css

wc-blocks.css

474 ms

accounting.min.js

accounting.min.js

470 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

480 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

539 ms

addons.min.js

addons.min.js

542 ms

image-cdn.js

image-cdn.js

541 ms

e-202419.js

e-202419.js

1 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

544 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

467 ms

frontend-checkout.min.js

frontend-checkout.min.js

452 ms

g.gif

g.gif

12 ms

headerbg.jpg

headerbg.jpg

366 ms

header.png

header.png

485 ms

headerbg2.jpg

headerbg2.jpg

317 ms

Left-Side.jpg

Left-Side.jpg

617 ms

Right-Side.jpg

Right-Side.jpg

499 ms

drawingboard.jpg

drawingboard.jpg

421 ms

clembold.otf

clembold.otf

410 ms

ave-rom.otf

ave-rom.otf

452 ms

ave-hvy.otf

ave-hvy.otf

506 ms

fontawesome-webfont.eot

fontawesome-webfont.eot

551 ms

g.gif

g.gif

18 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

71 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

73 ms

Accessibility Review

tomrichmond.com accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

tomrichmond.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

tomrichmond.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tomrichmond.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Tomrichmond.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tomrichmond.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tom Richmond. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: