Tools & Wizards About Us
tool-rank.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    42% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

tool-rank.com

Power Tool News & Reviews Blog - Tool-Rank.com

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

283 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

227 ms

tool-rank.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to tool-rank.com homepage info - get ready to check Tool Rank best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about tool-rank.com

Power tool review blog providing the latest in power tool news, tool information, and power tool reviews for contractors, woodworkers and DIYers. Featuring a blogger that enjoy tools, giveaways, and m...

Visit tool-rank.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tool-rank.com page load time and found that the first response time was 283 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tool-rank.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,350 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.132

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.4 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.tool-rank.com

283 ms

gppstub.js

50 ms

boise.js

34 ms

abilene.js

37 ms

tulsa.js

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Tool-rank.com, 11% (8 requests) were made to Google.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.taboola.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (283 ms) belongs to the original domain Tool-rank.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 167.7 kB (23%)

Content Size

718.4 kB

After Optimization

550.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tool-rank.com main page is 718.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 533.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 92.3 kB

  • Original 122.2 kB
  • After minification 122.2 kB
  • After compression 30.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.3 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 974 B

  • Original 4.0 kB
  • After minification 3.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tool Rank needs image optimization as it can save up to 974 B or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 36.5 kB

  • Original 533.5 kB
  • After minification 533.5 kB
  • After compression 497.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 38.0 kB

  • Original 58.8 kB
  • After minification 44.2 kB
  • After compression 20.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tool-rank.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 38.0 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (81%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tool Rank. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.tool-rank.com

www.tool-rank.com

283 ms

gppstub.js

gppstub.js

50 ms

boise.js

boise.js

34 ms

abilene.js

abilene.js

37 ms

tulsa.js

tulsa.js

38 ms

et.js

et.js

32 ms

gzip.php

gzip.php

89 ms

gzip.php

gzip.php

58 ms

gzip.php

gzip.php

70 ms

head.load.min.js

head.load.min.js

42 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

190 ms

core.js

core.js

140 ms

mootools-more.js

mootools-more.js

62 ms

gzip.php

gzip.php

131 ms

ccpaplus.js

ccpaplus.js

52 ms

onejs

onejs

8 ms

am.js

am.js

49 ms

21237X792557.skimlinks.js

21237X792557.skimlinks.js

64 ms

v.js

v.js

60 ms

mulvane.js

mulvane.js

56 ms

wichita.js

wichita.js

77 ms

raleigh.js

raleigh.js

75 ms

vista.js

vista.js

83 ms

am.js

am.js

62 ms

olathe.js

olathe.js

42 ms

locale-en_GB.js

locale-en_GB.js

46 ms

jquery-ui-1.9.2.custom.min.js

jquery-ui-1.9.2.custom.min.js

51 ms

jquery.ui.datepicker-en-GB.js

jquery.ui.datepicker-en-GB.js

135 ms

jreviews-all.min.js

jreviews-all.min.js

48 ms

lazy_load.js

lazy_load.js

40 ms

cse.js

cse.js

74 ms

88 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

26 ms

cse_element__en.js

cse_element__en.js

48 ms

default+en.css

default+en.css

48 ms

minimalist.css

minimalist.css

50 ms

collect

collect

124 ms

css_onload.js

css_onload.js

98 ms

vitals.js

vitals.js

99 ms

drake.js

drake.js

96 ms

chanute.js

chanute.js

97 ms

jellyfish.js

jellyfish.js

94 ms

default+en.css

default+en.css

76 ms

minimalist.css

minimalist.css

77 ms

async-ads.js

async-ads.js

53 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

56 ms

branding.png

branding.png

17 ms

clear.png

clear.png

17 ms

jquery-ui-1.9.2.custom.min.css

jquery-ui-1.9.2.custom.min.css

172 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

36 ms

custom_styles.css

custom_styles.css

174 ms

ccomment.css

ccomment.css

172 ms

gzip.php

gzip.php

76 ms

gzip.php

gzip.php

81 ms

pageImpression

pageImpression

172 ms

collect

collect

69 ms

js

js

87 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

5 ms

css

css

91 ms

css

css

91 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

15 ms

page

page

121 ms

background_username.png

background_username.png

48 ms

loader.js

loader.js

20 ms

SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaA.ttf

SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaA.ttf

29 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

159 ms

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf

TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUZiYA.ttf

29 ms

tr5

tr5

8 ms

impl.20240513-6-RELEASE.es5.js

impl.20240513-6-RELEASE.es5.js

19 ms

sync

sync

17 ms

json

json

67 ms

Accessibility Review

tool-rank.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

tool-rank.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

tool-rank.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tool-rank.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tool-rank.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tool-rank.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tool Rank. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: