2.6 sec in total
137 ms
1.7 sec
697 ms
Visit toplinesign.com now to see the best up-to-date Topline Sign content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about toplinesign.com
Visit toplinesign.comWe analyzed Toplinesign.com page load time and found that the first response time was 137 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
toplinesign.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value0
0/100
25%
Value8.9 s
15/100
10%
Value750 ms
39/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value14.0 s
10/100
10%
137 ms
193 ms
37 ms
73 ms
143 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Toplinesign.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Toplinesign.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (9%)
11.7 MB
10.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Toplinesign.com main page is 11.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 10.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 155.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 155.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 720.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Topline Sign images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 53.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 80.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Toplinesign.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 80.5 kB or 29% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (56%)
79
35
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Topline Sign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
toplinesign.com
137 ms
toplinesign.com
193 ms
style.min.css
37 ms
bootstrap.min.css
73 ms
style.css
143 ms
kd_vc_front.css
155 ms
ekko-font.css
97 ms
field_social_profiles_frontend.css
99 ms
js_composer.min.css
168 ms
font-awesome.min.css
106 ms
v4-shims.css
130 ms
jquery.min.js
167 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
148 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
162 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
197 ms
jquery.appear.js
199 ms
kd_addon_script.js
200 ms
jquery.easytabs.min.js
201 ms
css
44 ms
font-awesome.css
281 ms
animate.min.css
283 ms
v4-shims.min.css
279 ms
all.min.css
285 ms
vc_carousel.min.css
288 ms
trustindex-google-widget.css
291 ms
rs6.css
288 ms
wpforms-full.min.css
294 ms
rbtools.min.js
312 ms
rs6.min.js
367 ms
SmoothScroll.js
337 ms
scripts.js
338 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
343 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
337 ms
transition.min.js
337 ms
vc_carousel.min.js
371 ms
loader.js
30 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
364 ms
mailcheck.min.js
372 ms
punycode.min.js
370 ms
api.js
41 ms
utils.min.js
372 ms
wpforms.min.js
403 ms
css
19 ms
logo-secondary2.png
365 ms
AEdFTp6bGUNWxzmCanQlHaLZPnLur4P_e9zapsjoAq0s=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-br100
148 ms
embed
154 ms
AEdFTp7LHfg2mX0WyarJqhYJp9DtDKRoGFRV8Z6V-CNo=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-br100
161 ms
AEdFTp4LPiX1F3jGTt3nYtbIdwFQS1rNNhpz3Ag57pLG=s120-c-c-rp-w64-h64-mo-br100
158 ms
dummy.png
189 ms
Topline-Mobile-Header-scaled.jpg
690 ms
Maintenance-and-Repairs.jpg
159 ms
Design.png
160 ms
Installation.png
206 ms
Fabrication.png
206 ms
Maintenance.png
192 ms
Target-bg-scaled.jpg
159 ms
Target-2-scaled.jpg
375 ms
PORTFOLIO-2.png
452 ms
PORTFOLIO-3.png
673 ms
PORTFOLIO-4.png
364 ms
PORTFOLIO-5.png
815 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
142 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
157 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
156 ms
ekko-font.woff
390 ms
PORTFOLIO-6.png
579 ms
PORTFOLIO-8.png
778 ms
PORTFOLIO-9.png
971 ms
PORTFOLIO-10.png
850 ms
PORTFOLIO.png
866 ms
Top-Line-Icons.png
1056 ms
Daktronics.png
782 ms
watchfire1.png
782 ms
LG.png
791 ms
Nanolumens.png
789 ms
Archetype.png
822 ms
3M.png
818 ms
GSI.png
823 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_ObXbMZhKg.ttf
55 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
841 ms
red-chrome-logo-02.jpg
834 ms
red-chrome-logo-02-300x93.jpg
833 ms
submit-spin.svg
837 ms
js
49 ms
Maintenance-and-Repairs.jpg
919 ms
Target-bg-scaled.jpg
858 ms
recaptcha__en.js
139 ms
geometry.js
117 ms
search.js
123 ms
main.js
128 ms
toplinesign.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
No form fields have multiple labels
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
toplinesign.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
toplinesign.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Toplinesign.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Toplinesign.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
toplinesign.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Topline Sign. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: