5.6 sec in total
614 ms
4.5 sec
484 ms
Click here to check amazing TOPS Packing content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about topspacking.com
We specialize in the fields of designing, manufacturing, selling, and servicing a complete line of machinery for different kinds of powder and granular
Visit topspacking.comWe analyzed Topspacking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 614 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
topspacking.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value14.0 s
0/100
25%
Value7.5 s
27/100
10%
Value3,200 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.828
4/100
15%
Value7.6 s
47/100
10%
614 ms
63 ms
993 ms
1060 ms
1422 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Topspacking.com, 78% (47 requests) were made to Cdn.globalso.com and 18% (11 requests) were made to Globalso.site. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.globalso.com.
Page size can be reduced by 280.0 kB (10%)
2.7 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Topspacking.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 154.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. TOPS Packing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 42.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 42.6 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Topspacking.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.6 kB or 27% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (30%)
56
39
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TOPS Packing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
topspacking.com
614 ms
js
63 ms
lite-yt-embed.js
993 ms
lite-yt-embed.css
1060 ms
style.css
1422 ms
public.css
1155 ms
livechat.js
473 ms
form.js
474 ms
jquery.min.js
1293 ms
common.js
1136 ms
public.js
1322 ms
cookie_consent_banner.js
1323 ms
logo.png
193 ms
Ban-ner10.jpg
1017 ms
Ban-ner7.jpg
595 ms
Ban-ner11.jpg
783 ms
Ribbon-Blending-Machine01.jpg
799 ms
auger-filling-machine01.jpg
512 ms
Automatic-Capping-Machine01.jpg
1373 ms
tops-about2.jpg
849 ms
tops-about.jpg
1542 ms
tops-about1.jpg
1033 ms
Automatic-Capping-Machine.jpg
1240 ms
TDPM-Series-Double-Ribbon-Mixer.jpg
1106 ms
TP-V-series-Automatic-Vertical.jpg
1759 ms
TPW-Series-Double-shaft-paddle-mixer.jpg
1149 ms
Automatic-Labeling-Machine-For-round-bottles.jpg
1951 ms
Auto-liquid-filling-capping-machine.jpg
2838 ms
Rotary-type-pouch-packing-machine.jpg
1840 ms
Powder-Auger-Filler.jpg
1684 ms
img311.png
1852 ms
img410.png
2041 ms
ce1.jpg
2073 ms
ce2.jpg
2110 ms
ce3.jpg
2307 ms
ce.jpg
2464 ms
footer-company1.jpg
509 ms
sns01.png
2409 ms
sns03.png
2629 ms
youtube1.png
2609 ms
2024825_inquiry_livechat_topspackingcom
487 ms
header-bg.jpg
125 ms
all-m.gif
558 ms
title_pic.png
125 ms
icons01.png
347 ms
close.png
331 ms
show_btn.png
529 ms
2024825_inquiry_form_topspackingcom
345 ms
ebrimabd.ttf
318 ms
ebrima.ttf
318 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
377 ms
loading.gif
762 ms
from_livechat.css
10 ms
jquery.min.js
16 ms
layer.js
31 ms
group_oper.js
31 ms
validform.min.js
33 ms
jquery.cookie.js
30 ms
layer.css
43 ms
cookie_css.css
69 ms
topspacking.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
topspacking.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
topspacking.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Topspacking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Topspacking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
topspacking.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of TOPS Packing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: