16.9 sec in total
4.7 sec
12.1 sec
153 ms
Click here to check amazing Touch Canterbury content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about touchcanterbury.com
Visit touchcanterbury.comWe analyzed Touchcanterbury.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.7 sec and then it took 12.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
touchcanterbury.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value6.7 s
35/100
10%
Value180 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.178
68/100
15%
Value6.7 s
57/100
10%
4722 ms
18 ms
3350 ms
3397 ms
1309 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 23% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Touchcanterbury.com, 17% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Touchcanterbury.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (72%)
2.7 MB
765.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Touchcanterbury.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.5 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Touch Canterbury images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.4 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 511.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Touchcanterbury.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 511.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (61%)
38
15
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Touch Canterbury. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.touchcanterbury.com
4722 ms
css
18 ms
bootstrap.min.css
3350 ms
network-styles.css
3397 ms
em-theme-tl.css
1309 ms
evvnt_discovery_plugin.js
66 ms
jquery.min.js
21 ms
geoPosition-matchMedia.js
4427 ms
bootstrap.min.js
20 ms
em.js
2294 ms
typeahead.min.js
315 ms
ga.js
54 ms
logo-src.png
1949 ms
network.png
2901 ms
network-logo-scoot-plain.png
1941 ms
APH4jr0uSos5wiut5cpjronF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
93 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1007 ms
submission_button.html
6 ms
new.evvnt.com
135 ms
evvnt_discovery_plugin.css
53 ms
respond.min.js
68 ms
__utm.gif
34 ms
css
49 ms
icon
21 ms
index-d20007aa803d700e291b46f8898a6585.css
39 ms
index-594b0df74600d67eddcab1f12c60f40e.js
85 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
76 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
700 ms
webfont.js
689 ms
fs.js
614 ms
hotjar-552266.js
563 ms
form_evvnt_logo.png
271 ms
categories
378 ms
2fcrYFNaTjcS6g4U3t-Y5StnKWgpfO2iSkLzTz-AABg.ttf
61 ms
css
60 ms
modules-f524bccd859bfc7e394e1123f7f90405.js
81 ms
rcj-99d43ead6bdf30da8ed5ffcb4f17100c.html
71 ms
page
289 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
4 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
10 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
9 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxp_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
12 ms
currencies
43 ms
url_types
29 ms
countries
46 ms
nr-1044.min.js
12 ms
fa3d779a1e
98 ms
touchcanterbury.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
touchcanterbury.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Requests the geolocation permission on page load
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
touchcanterbury.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Touchcanterbury.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Touchcanterbury.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
touchcanterbury.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Touch Canterbury. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: