1.5 sec in total
28 ms
1.1 sec
365 ms
Click here to check amazing Tracer 1 content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tracer1.com
Tracer is a manufacturer with over a decade of R&D and patent awards in lenticular printing, innovative retail photo products and illuminated menu boards.
Visit tracer1.comWe analyzed Tracer1.com page load time and found that the first response time was 28 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
tracer1.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value55.1 s
0/100
25%
Value22.6 s
0/100
10%
Value1,220 ms
20/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value26.1 s
0/100
10%
28 ms
303 ms
84 ms
20 ms
22 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Tracer1.com, 10% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (527 ms) belongs to the original domain Tracer1.com.
Page size can be reduced by 284.5 kB (11%)
2.7 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Tracer1.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 152.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 152.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 110.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tracer 1 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 10.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tracer1.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.4 kB or 11% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (72%)
78
22
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tracer 1. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tracer1.com
28 ms
tracer1.com
303 ms
js
84 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
20 ms
layerslider.css
22 ms
style.min.css
22 ms
styles.css
22 ms
settings.css
28 ms
style.css
28 ms
base.css
31 ms
layout.css
34 ms
shortcodes.css
42 ms
animations.min.css
25 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
41 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
47 ms
responsive.css
39 ms
css
72 ms
addtoany.min.css
48 ms
greensock.js
50 ms
jquery.js
50 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
47 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
52 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
48 ms
page.js
50 ms
addtoany.min.js
47 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
108 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
48 ms
js
128 ms
js
107 ms
css
154 ms
css
180 ms
choices.min.css
46 ms
wpforms-full.min.css
49 ms
scripts.js
48 ms
api.js
50 ms
script.js
49 ms
core.min.js
50 ms
widget.min.js
51 ms
mouse.min.js
51 ms
sortable.min.js
53 ms
tabs.min.js
50 ms
accordion.min.js
50 ms
plugins.js
152 ms
menu.js
51 ms
animations.min.js
52 ms
api.js
173 ms
jplayer.min.js
123 ms
translate3d.js
109 ms
scripts.js
108 ms
wp-embed.min.js
105 ms
choices.min.js
134 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
102 ms
jquery.inputmask.min.js
128 ms
mailcheck.min.js
101 ms
punycode.min.js
98 ms
utils.min.js
120 ms
wpforms.min.js
137 ms
tracer_logo.png
52 ms
dummy.png
51 ms
OptikaDukeComp6.gif
199 ms
Snap_Canvas_all_1.gif
187 ms
Snap2Banner2.gif
527 ms
ActionPicturesBanner7.gif
189 ms
LitewriterBanner6.gif
190 ms
TRC_Logo_300dpi.png
192 ms
sm.25.html
122 ms
eso.D0Uc7kY6.js
188 ms
box_shadow.png
137 ms
2201263d-d2cf-41fc-9c4c-bd4d0ef4f202.js
169 ms
recaptcha__en.js
376 ms
box_shadow_button.png
94 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
319 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
398 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
396 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
396 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
396 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
326 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0ow.ttf
326 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXh0ow.ttf
401 ms
mfn-icons.woff
91 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
58 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
38 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
58 ms
revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js
55 ms
revolution.extension.parallax.min.js
59 ms
top_bar_right_shadow.png
54 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
304 ms
coloredbg.png
134 ms
black-background3-1024x534.png
134 ms
loader.gif
133 ms
tracer1.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
tracer1.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
tracer1.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tracer1.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tracer1.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tracer1.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tracer 1. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: