Tools & Wizards About Us
trackingcentre.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

trackingcentre.co.uk

GPS Trackers for Vehicles, People & Businesses - TrackingCentre.co.uk

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

202 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

408 ms

trackingcentre.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit trackingcentre.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Tracking Centre content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about trackingcentre.co.uk

Shop for GPS, Bluetooth, RFID and WiFi Trackers at TrackingCentre.co.uk – The Ultimate Source for Asset Tracking & Security.

Visit trackingcentre.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Trackingcentre.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 202 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

trackingcentre.co.uk performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

74/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.078

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

trackingcentre.co.uk

202 ms

www.trackingcentre.co.uk

556 ms

css

323 ms

modernizr

415 ms

css

43 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Trackingcentre.co.uk, 6% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (575 ms) belongs to the original domain Trackingcentre.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 182.8 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Trackingcentre.co.uk main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 32.9 kB

  • Original 39.8 kB
  • After minification 29.6 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.2 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 86.5 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tracking Centre images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 39.3 kB

  • Original 58.1 kB
  • After minification 58.0 kB
  • After compression 18.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 39.3 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 24.0 kB

  • Original 31.0 kB
  • After minification 31.0 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Trackingcentre.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (38%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tracking Centre. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

trackingcentre.co.uk

trackingcentre.co.uk

202 ms

www.trackingcentre.co.uk

www.trackingcentre.co.uk

556 ms

css

css

323 ms

modernizr

modernizr

415 ms

css

css

43 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

527 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

347 ms

js

js

66 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

cookieconsent.min.css

40 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

cookieconsent.min.js

50 ms

jquery

jquery

553 ms

bootstrap

bootstrap

330 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

102 ms

ra-bootstrap.min.js

ra-bootstrap.min.js

459 ms

fs.js

fs.js

176 ms

logo.png

logo.png

125 ms

slider0.jpg

slider0.jpg

343 ms

slider1.jpg

slider1.jpg

515 ms

slider3.jpg

slider3.jpg

346 ms

logo-inverse.png

logo-inverse.png

125 ms

van.jpg

van.jpg

302 ms

personal.jpg

personal.jpg

281 ms

plant.jpg

plant.jpg

552 ms

vehiclereview1.jpg

vehiclereview1.jpg

378 ms

personalreview1.jpg

personalreview1.jpg

393 ms

personalreview2.jpg

personalreview2.jpg

432 ms

vehiclereview2.jpg

vehiclereview2.jpg

446 ms

vehiclereview3.jpg

vehiclereview3.jpg

473 ms

asset-command.png

asset-command.png

575 ms

forklift.jpg

forklift.jpg

534 ms

asset-protection.jpg

asset-protection.jpg

547 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

20 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

463 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

492 ms

fs.js

fs.js

52 ms

Accessibility Review

trackingcentre.co.uk accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

trackingcentre.co.uk best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

trackingcentre.co.uk SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trackingcentre.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Trackingcentre.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

trackingcentre.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tracking Centre. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: