Tools & Wizards About Us
trading.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

trading.com

Instant, Easy Access to the Forex Markets | Trading.com

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

620 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

329 ms

trading.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to trading.com homepage info - get ready to check Trading best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about trading.com

Experience instant, transparent, and easy access to the forex markets with trading.com. Open an account today and start trading with confidence.

Visit trading.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Trading.com page load time and found that the first response time was 620 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

trading.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

27/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

63/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,350 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.282

43/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.1 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

620 ms

gtm.js

66 ms

styles.73dc3357575ddf89.css

265 ms

runtime.412319b802ab7e26.js

253 ms

polyfills.86a0a5caad7b9067.js

242 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Trading.com, 6% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 6% (1 request) were made to S.go-mpulse.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (717 ms) belongs to the original domain Trading.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 631.4 kB (49%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

669.8 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Trading.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 572.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 154.0 kB

  • Original 195.4 kB
  • After minification 194.0 kB
  • After compression 41.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 154.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 21.8 kB

  • Original 572.1 kB
  • After minification 572.1 kB
  • After compression 550.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 455.6 kB

  • Original 533.7 kB
  • After minification 529.3 kB
  • After compression 78.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Trading.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 455.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (38%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Trading. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

620 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

66 ms

styles.73dc3357575ddf89.css

styles.73dc3357575ddf89.css

265 ms

runtime.412319b802ab7e26.js

runtime.412319b802ab7e26.js

253 ms

polyfills.86a0a5caad7b9067.js

polyfills.86a0a5caad7b9067.js

242 ms

main.a04e334add667bfa.js

main.a04e334add667bfa.js

369 ms

YPPmsHOmM

YPPmsHOmM

85 ms

N45R2-S2F5G-MNW83-D6WU6-QFFC7

N45R2-S2F5G-MNW83-D6WU6-QFFC7

160 ms

public-icons.svg

public-icons.svg

127 ms

trophies-undefinedw.webp

trophies-undefinedw.webp

137 ms

feature-shield-undefinedw.webp

feature-shield-undefinedw.webp

161 ms

feature-spreads@1x.2f8e5adf3d3fa3eb.webp

feature-spreads@1x.2f8e5adf3d3fa3eb.webp

104 ms

feature-zero@2x.1b140b09390ec48a.webp

feature-zero@2x.1b140b09390ec48a.webp

77 ms

gilroy_regular-webfont.woff

gilroy_regular-webfont.woff

250 ms

gilroy_medium-webfont.woff

gilroy_medium-webfont.woff

311 ms

gilroy_semibold-webfont.woff

gilroy_semibold-webfont.woff

386 ms

gilroy_bold-webfont.woff

gilroy_bold-webfont.woff

717 ms

config.json

config.json

72 ms

Accessibility Review

trading.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Best Practices

trading.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

trading.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trading.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Trading.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

trading.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Trading. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: