Tools & Wizards About Us
transbull.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

transbull.com

Grupo Transbull | Consignatarios y Agentes de Aduanas

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

521 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

521 ms

transbull.com screenshot

About Website

Visit transbull.com now to see the best up-to-date Transbull content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about transbull.com

Empresa logística: transporte de mercancías, consignatarios, agentes de aduanas, almacenes reefer, con presencia en Cádiz, Algeciras, Motril y Almería.

Visit transbull.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Transbull.com page load time and found that the first response time was 521 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

transbull.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.2 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value620 ms

48/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.584

11/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.0 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

transbull.com

521 ms

autoptimize_fb69167561495df965ff2aea184ab442.css

515 ms

autoptimize_ccf139056ed3718b67f878ec70e6f040.css

304 ms

autoptimize_58795c7bee341d5f683d644109ee04e0.css

314 ms

css

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Transbull.com, 21% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Transbull.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 660.0 kB (41%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

939.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Transbull.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 980.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 92.5 kB

  • Original 119.2 kB
  • After minification 118.7 kB
  • After compression 26.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 57.8 kB

  • Original 274.1 kB
  • After minification 216.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Transbull needs image optimization as it can save up to 57.8 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 509.1 kB

  • Original 980.4 kB
  • After minification 980.4 kB
  • After compression 471.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 509.1 kB or 52% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 669 B

  • Original 225.7 kB
  • After minification 225.7 kB
  • After compression 225.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Transbull.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (63%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Transbull. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

transbull.com

transbull.com

521 ms

autoptimize_fb69167561495df965ff2aea184ab442.css

autoptimize_fb69167561495df965ff2aea184ab442.css

515 ms

autoptimize_ccf139056ed3718b67f878ec70e6f040.css

autoptimize_ccf139056ed3718b67f878ec70e6f040.css

304 ms

autoptimize_58795c7bee341d5f683d644109ee04e0.css

autoptimize_58795c7bee341d5f683d644109ee04e0.css

314 ms

css

css

35 ms

autoptimize_single_38fdf18ad9cd504aea769dd7a4082dc8.css

autoptimize_single_38fdf18ad9cd504aea769dd7a4082dc8.css

313 ms

autoptimize_single_192b924e8f6319a3b7f7f9cd406bb6ea.css

autoptimize_single_192b924e8f6319a3b7f7f9cd406bb6ea.css

315 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

575 ms

js

js

65 ms

css

css

19 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

305 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

318 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

477 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

322 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

407 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

838 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

1051 ms

OneSignalSDK.js

OneSignalSDK.js

41 ms

autoptimize_d01f38333f260f12d06423e587f66337.js

autoptimize_d01f38333f260f12d06423e587f66337.js

819 ms

Grupo-Transbull-fondo-color.png

Grupo-Transbull-fondo-color.png

133 ms

logo-transbull-light.png

logo-transbull-light.png

316 ms

es.png

es.png

134 ms

es.png

es.png

216 ms

en.png

en.png

216 ms

fr.png

fr.png

305 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

313 ms

Grupo-Transbull-fondo-color-200x39.png

Grupo-Transbull-fondo-color-200x39.png

407 ms

NaPecZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMPmCA.ttf

NaPecZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMPmCA.ttf

78 ms

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffGjEGItzZg.ttf

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffGjEGItzZg.ttf

79 ms

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffHjDGItzZg.ttf

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffHjDGItzZg.ttf

78 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

466 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

319 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

13 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

39 ms

xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk4aE9_C-bw.ttf

xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk4aE9_C-bw.ttf

28 ms

xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk59E9_C-bw.ttf

xn7_YHE41ni1AdIRqAuZuw1Bx9mbZk59E9_C-bw.ttf

39 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

40 ms

autoptimize_deb2da7ddad6f9a0909ad3216749b285.css

autoptimize_deb2da7ddad6f9a0909ad3216749b285.css

102 ms

Accessibility Review

transbull.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

transbull.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

transbull.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Transbull.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Spanish language. Our system also found out that Transbull.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

transbull.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Transbull. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: