Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

transporter.city

Transporter : Simplify and Intellify Deliveries

Page Load Speed

12.6 sec in total

First Response

751 ms

Resources Loaded

11.3 sec

Page Rendered

576 ms

transporter.city screenshot

About Website

Visit transporter.city now to see the best up-to-date Transporter content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about transporter.city

​​Move away from getting quotes to booking via web, mobile, SMS or email for 100+ carriers across India. Schedule deliveries a week or even months in advance.

Visit transporter.city

Key Findings

We analyzed Transporter.city page load time and found that the first response time was 751 ms and then it took 11.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

transporter.city performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

transporter.city

751 ms

index

4702 ms

knight-iconfont.css

733 ms

font-awesome.min.css

530 ms

bootstrap.min.css

750 ms

Our browser made a total of 116 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Transporter.city, 23% (27 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 9% (11 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Transporter.city.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 925.5 kB (38%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Transporter.city main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 156.6 kB

  • Original 185.8 kB
  • After minification 135.3 kB
  • After compression 29.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 50.5 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 156.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 44.0 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Transporter images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 723.3 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 345.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 723.3 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 2.0 kB
  • After minification 1.0 kB
  • After compression 329 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Transporter.city needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (55%)

Requests Now

95

After Optimization

43

The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Transporter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

transporter.city SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Transporter.city can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Transporter.city main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Transporter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: