Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

trapmat-micostep.nl

Trapmatten en trapmaantjes kopen. Beste prijs en kwaliteit

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

359 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

738 ms

trapmat-micostep.nl screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Trapmat Micostep content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about trapmat-micostep.nl

Micostep® kunststof trapmaantjes met anti slip laag maken van uw trap een ware eyecatcher! Ze zijn mooi, duurzaam en gaan wel 10 jaar mee.

Visit trapmat-micostep.nl

Key Findings

We analyzed Trapmat-micostep.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 359 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

trapmat-micostep.nl performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

53/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

78/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.158

73/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.8 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

trapmat-micostep.nl

359 ms

www.trapmat-micostep.nl

461 ms

510 ms

email-decode.min.js

24 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

204 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Trapmat-micostep.nl, 65% (22 requests) were made to Micostep.com and 26% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (680 ms) relates to the external source Micostep.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 429.2 kB (75%)

Content Size

574.9 kB

After Optimization

145.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Trapmat-micostep.nl main page is 574.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 501.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 429.0 kB

  • Original 501.7 kB
  • After minification 501.7 kB
  • After compression 72.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 429.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 2.3 kB
  • After minification 2.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Trapmat Micostep images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 120 B

  • Original 70.9 kB
  • After minification 70.9 kB
  • After compression 70.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (86%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Trapmat Micostep. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

trapmat-micostep.nl accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

trapmat-micostep.nl best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

trapmat-micostep.nl SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trapmat-micostep.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Trapmat-micostep.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: