Tools & Wizards About Us
trapperking.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 50

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

trapperking.com

Trapper King Animal Removal - Rodent, Raccoon Attic Control - Tampa Bay Bradenton Lakeland Sarasota Orlando

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

44 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

125 ms

trapperking.com screenshot

About Website

Visit trapperking.com now to see the best up-to-date Trapper King content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about trapperking.com

We are Experts at Animal Control, Bee Removal, Animal Trapping and Rodent Control in the in Tampa Bay Area - Servicing Land o Lakes, Dunedin, Plant City, Orlando, St Petersburg, Ocala, Spring Hill, La...

Visit trapperking.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Trapperking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 44 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

trapperking.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.502

16/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.trapperking.com

44 ms

site.css

17 ms

duel.js

32 ms

getSeal

846 ms

js

65 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Trapperking.com, 38% (21 requests) were made to Img1.wsimg.com and 25% (14 requests) were made to Nebula.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (846 ms) relates to the external source Seal.godaddy.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 327.4 kB (34%)

Content Size

952.9 kB

After Optimization

625.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Trapperking.com main page is 952.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 475.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 48.6 kB

  • Original 61.8 kB
  • After minification 61.8 kB
  • After compression 13.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 6.1 kB

  • Original 280.7 kB
  • After minification 274.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Trapper King images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 217.8 kB

  • Original 475.6 kB
  • After minification 475.3 kB
  • After compression 257.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 217.8 kB or 46% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 55.0 kB

  • Original 134.9 kB
  • After minification 134.7 kB
  • After compression 79.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Trapperking.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 55.0 kB or 41% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (58%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Trapper King. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.trapperking.com

www.trapperking.com

44 ms

site.css

site.css

17 ms

duel.js

duel.js

32 ms

getSeal

getSeal

846 ms

js

js

65 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

184 ms

jq.js

jq.js

30 ms

48aed2aec9d3d3da917bb00909484066

48aed2aec9d3d3da917bb00909484066

38 ms

nURzAN-LlWc

nURzAN-LlWc

152 ms

media.gallery.js

media.gallery.js

24 ms

un91DDcMbrE

un91DDcMbrE

255 ms

customForm.published.js

customForm.published.js

22 ms

subNavigation.js

subNavigation.js

29 ms

cookiemanager.js

cookiemanager.js

26 ms

iebackground.js

iebackground.js

38 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

95 ms

cc0d6acf10b4031df979fc749f93102a

cc0d6acf10b4031df979fc749f93102a

26 ms

cc55294e216ff68aecbea01e474b5d14

cc55294e216ff68aecbea01e474b5d14

30 ms

438628d23ea1f2e627a741889dc450aa

438628d23ea1f2e627a741889dc450aa

29 ms

e253b7258ff32409f9f3c707e65cfc91

e253b7258ff32409f9f3c707e65cfc91

32 ms

695fb025aa551b3a9d0794b3c1c08901

695fb025aa551b3a9d0794b3c1c08901

33 ms

69cf78403faf5e7ac14069be696e953b

69cf78403faf5e7ac14069be696e953b

30 ms

f0218d6cb8a4d86427b8f6f480478f12

f0218d6cb8a4d86427b8f6f480478f12

30 ms

6d1740cb4bdc3cf3518a2290c30bee9a

6d1740cb4bdc3cf3518a2290c30bee9a

36 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

35 ms

util.instances.js

util.instances.js

14 ms

util.model.js

util.model.js

18 ms

documentHelper.js

documentHelper.js

19 ms

regexhelper.js

regexhelper.js

16 ms

api.guid.js

api.guid.js

75 ms

jquery.xDomainRequest.js

jquery.xDomainRequest.js

73 ms

tipper.js

tipper.js

75 ms

datepicker.js

datepicker.js

74 ms

jquery.watermark.js

jquery.watermark.js

74 ms

util.window.js

util.window.js

71 ms

0d91d925770477880b44f429e1377f2e

0d91d925770477880b44f429e1377f2e

45 ms

wsb-slideshow-arrows.png

wsb-slideshow-arrows.png

42 ms

font

font

57 ms

u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZK.woff

u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZK.woff

24 ms

collect

collect

44 ms

sf.datepicker.js

sf.datepicker.js

46 ms

sf.tipper.js

sf.tipper.js

63 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

79 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

112 ms

base.js

base.js

189 ms

2fc8b7367a3986fe8d2aa2464c66fe9f

2fc8b7367a3986fe8d2aa2464c66fe9f

36 ms

df31194c4be2c5c23cbed0b2deb892dc

df31194c4be2c5c23cbed0b2deb892dc

150 ms

252e162e2ca8c6c5509ac12148205284

252e162e2ca8c6c5509ac12148205284

12 ms

9c1ca57bdd2e61d18ff92f53d210ca30

9c1ca57bdd2e61d18ff92f53d210ca30

56 ms

collect

collect

163 ms

js

js

623 ms

sf.core.pkg.js

sf.core.pkg.js

18 ms

app.css

app.css

143 ms

app.css

app.css

125 ms

in.php

in.php

580 ms

Accessibility Review

trapperking.com accessibility score

50

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

trapperking.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

trapperking.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trapperking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Trapperking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

trapperking.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Trapper King. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: