Tools & Wizards About Us
travelguardapp.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

travelguardapp.com

Travel Guard App -

Page Load Speed

6.6 sec in total

First Response

2 sec

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

944 ms

travelguardapp.com screenshot

About Website

Visit travelguardapp.com now to see the best up-to-date Travel Guard App content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about travelguardapp.com

Visit travelguardapp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Travelguardapp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

travelguardapp.com performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,230 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.461

19/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.1 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

travelguardapp.com

1993 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

106 ms

style.min.css

278 ms

styles.css

345 ms

dashicons.min.css

283 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Travelguardapp.com, 30% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Travelguardapp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 207.6 kB (58%)

Content Size

356.9 kB

After Optimization

149.3 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Travelguardapp.com main page is 356.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 199.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 55.1 kB

  • Original 66.5 kB
  • After minification 62.9 kB
  • After compression 11.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 18.6 kB

  • Original 91.3 kB
  • After minification 91.3 kB
  • After compression 72.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 18.6 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 133.9 kB

  • Original 199.2 kB
  • After minification 158.2 kB
  • After compression 65.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Travelguardapp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 133.9 kB or 67% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (91%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Travel Guard App. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

travelguardapp.com

travelguardapp.com

1993 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

106 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

278 ms

styles.css

styles.css

345 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

283 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

157 ms

style.css

style.css

345 ms

style.css

style.css

152 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

209 ms

css

css

110 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

320 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

267 ms

submit.js

submit.js

709 ms

index.js

index.js

721 ms

index.js

index.js

706 ms

custom.js

custom.js

705 ms

all.min.js

all.min.js

1154 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

706 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

704 ms

owlcarousel2-a11ylayer.min.js

owlcarousel2-a11ylayer.min.js

705 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

705 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

713 ms

custom.min.js

custom.min.js

714 ms

modal-accessibility.min.js

modal-accessibility.min.js

714 ms

LogoMakr-1sUYJH.png

LogoMakr-1sUYJH.png

308 ms

couple-family-traveling-together_1150-7772-787x588.webp

couple-family-traveling-together_1150-7772-787x588.webp

308 ms

unnamed-1.png

unnamed-1.png

308 ms

download-6.jpg

download-6.jpg

308 ms

thumbnail-70812.png

thumbnail-70812.png

308 ms

5-reasons-travel-app-2-787x500.jpg

5-reasons-travel-app-2-787x500.jpg

305 ms

download-7.jpg

download-7.jpg

306 ms

16044ac74e121c1e73518d72ebfa8472.jpg

16044ac74e121c1e73518d72ebfa8472.jpg

305 ms

images-3.jpg

images-3.jpg

305 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfAZ9hjQ.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfAZ9hjQ.ttf

182 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fAZ9hjQ.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fAZ9hjQ.ttf

191 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfAZ9hjQ.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfAZ9hjQ.ttf

297 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfAZ9hjQ.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfAZ9hjQ.ttf

302 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeAZ9hjQ.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeAZ9hjQ.ttf

376 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYAZ9hjQ.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYAZ9hjQ.ttf

372 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYAZ9hjQ.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYAZ9hjQ.ttf

406 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYAZ9hjQ.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYAZ9hjQ.ttf

411 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYAZ9hjQ.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYAZ9hjQ.ttf

404 ms

co3bmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjYqXtP.ttf

co3bmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjYqXtP.ttf

411 ms

co3YmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjQWlhfvg-N.ttf

co3YmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjQWlhfvg-N.ttf

418 ms

co3YmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjQAllfvg-N.ttf

co3YmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjQAllfvg-N.ttf

417 ms

co3YmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjQdl9fvg-N.ttf

co3YmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjQdl9fvg-N.ttf

414 ms

co3YmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjQEl5fvg-N.ttf

co3YmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjQEl5fvg-N.ttf

414 ms

Accessibility Review

travelguardapp.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

travelguardapp.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

travelguardapp.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Travelguardapp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Travelguardapp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

travelguardapp.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Travel Guard App. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: