3.1 sec in total
516 ms
2.3 sec
307 ms
Visit traveloclick.com now to see the best up-to-date Traveloclick content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about traveloclick.com
Parked Domain name on Hostinger DNS system
Visit traveloclick.comWe analyzed Traveloclick.com page load time and found that the first response time was 516 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
traveloclick.com performance score
516 ms
681 ms
251 ms
499 ms
335 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Traveloclick.com, 13% (9 requests) were made to Travelforcelive.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Image.providesupport.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Travelforcelive.com.
Page size can be reduced by 741.7 kB (23%)
3.2 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Traveloclick.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 139.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 61.7 kB, which is 39% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 139.6 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Traveloclick images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 415.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 415.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 137.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Traveloclick.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 137.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (35%)
34
22
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Traveloclick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
traveloclick.com
516 ms
flights
681 ms
WebResource.axd
251 ms
ScriptResource.axd
499 ms
ScriptResource.axd
335 ms
holiday_oPackage.css
380 ms
DefaultPageStyle.css
403 ms
search.css
252 ms
style.css
254 ms
HolidayWL.css
347 ms
jquery-1.8.2.js
339 ms
jquery-ui-1.9.1.js
340 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.css
454 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.css
462 ms
jquery.custom-scrollbar.css
446 ms
style.css
477 ms
jquery.custom-scrollbar.js
536 ms
CommonFlow.js
496 ms
Utils.js
508 ms
ncb2c_master.js
532 ms
ncb2c.js
548 ms
logo.png
564 ms
specialoffer.png
599 ms
log_in.png
603 ms
submit-btn.png
611 ms
or.png
544 ms
submit-hotel.png
547 ms
search_btn.png
568 ms
102.jpg
621 ms
010920151235443544_T.jpg
884 ms
041120150540194019_T.jpg
954 ms
041120150532523252_T.jpg
960 ms
20112015053900390_T.jpg
827 ms
070920151041364136_T.jpg
1140 ms
22022013161707177_T.jpg
800 ms
110120160657485748_T.jpg
880 ms
250720141327462746_T.jpg
1006 ms
close.jpg
494 ms
ios-icon.png
530 ms
google-play.png
531 ms
close-image.png
543 ms
Continue-with-original-search.jpg
544 ms
Search-for-special-return-fares.jpg
616 ms
marquee.jpg
578 ms
f.png
617 ms
t.png
620 ms
google-plus.png
627 ms
y.png
622 ms
ajax-loader.gif
577 ms
indicator.gif
616 ms
ga.js
13 ms
fbds.js
12 ms
phone.png
326 ms
mail.png
327 ms
sptr.png
341 ms
border_bot.jpg
350 ms
safe-standard.js
52 ms
107 ms
inpage_linkid.js
7 ms
holiday_bg.jpg
344 ms
form_bg.png
387 ms
index.htm
383 ms
__utm.gif
19 ms
arw.png
363 ms
logo.png
371 ms
offline-749650552.gif
4 ms
lcbpsh.gif
4 ms
0gd9hk6b1mgnt1ss4dopws6mbx
39 ms
collect
61 ms
ga-audiences
40 ms
19 ms
traveloclick.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Traveloclick.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Traveloclick.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
traveloclick.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Traveloclick. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: