9.9 sec in total
2.6 sec
6.5 sec
749 ms
Welcome to travelofix.com homepage info - get ready to check Travelofix best content right away, or after learning these important things about travelofix.com
Inspiration For Your Next Vacation
Visit travelofix.comWe analyzed Travelofix.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
travelofix.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.7 s
0/100
10%
Value13.7 s
0/100
25%
Value9.1 s
14/100
10%
Value1,190 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.034
100/100
15%
Value17.1 s
4/100
10%
2623 ms
68 ms
440 ms
297 ms
207 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Travelofix.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Travelofix.com.
Page size can be reduced by 762.2 kB (31%)
2.4 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Travelofix.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Travelofix images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 313.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 313.5 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 389.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Travelofix.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 389.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (62%)
68
26
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Travelofix. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.travelofix.com
2623 ms
cloudflare.min.js
68 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
440 ms
styles.css
297 ms
mappress.css
207 ms
css
97 ms
userpro.min.css
373 ms
lightview.css
286 ms
userpro-jquery-ui.css
310 ms
style.css
470 ms
style.css
515 ms
css
106 ms
font-awesome.css
477 ms
widgets.min.css
541 ms
form-basic.min.css
530 ms
jetpack.css
664 ms
jquery.js
776 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
658 ms
userpro-social.min.js
674 ms
adsbygoogle.js
71 ms
jquery.form.min.js
699 ms
scripts.js
714 ms
core.min.js
962 ms
datepicker.min.js
1076 ms
swfobject.js
876 ms
spinners.min.js
874 ms
lightview.js
962 ms
scripts.min.js
1074 ms
performance.js
1073 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
67 ms
gprofiles.js
201 ms
wpgroho.js
1073 ms
bootstrap.js
1209 ms
theme.js
1209 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1144 ms
e-201611.js
67 ms
ga.js
80 ms
cropped-San-Francisco-California.jpg
805 ms
The-best-Moroccan-itinerary.jpg
744 ms
melenos-lindos-hotel.jpg
689 ms
rodini-park-zoo.jpg
690 ms
RHODES-TOWN-shopping.jpg
779 ms
Stacy-Eva.jpg
687 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
118 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
206 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
206 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
908 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
875 ms
ca-pub-5231950525952641.js
22 ms
zrt_lookup.html
189 ms
show_ads_impl.js
101 ms
FarFarAway.jpg
986 ms
__utm.gif
148 ms
www.travelofix.com
1540 ms
ads
459 ms
osd.js
74 ms
ads
296 ms
ads
428 ms
hovercard.css
50 ms
services.css
131 ms
sprite.png
924 ms
blank.gif
877 ms
g.gif
49 ms
3190177054125941482
84 ms
abg.js
63 ms
m_js_controller.js
85 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
48 ms
6177379119470357720
57 ms
s
53 ms
x_button_blue2.png
58 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
6 ms
favicon
35 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
20 ms
travelofix.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
travelofix.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
travelofix.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Travelofix.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Travelofix.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
travelofix.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Travelofix. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: