Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

travelpicks.com

TravelPicks – Top Picks, Reviews & Things To Do

Page Load Speed

891 ms in total

First Response

65 ms

Resources Loaded

605 ms

Page Rendered

221 ms

travelpicks.com screenshot

About Website

Visit travelpicks.com now to see the best up-to-date Travel Picks content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about travelpicks.com

.elementor-heading-title{padding:0;margin:0;line-height:1}.elementor-widget-heading .elementor-heading-title[class*=elementor-size-]>a{color:inherit;font-size:inherit;line-height:inherit}.elementor-wi...

Visit travelpicks.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Travelpicks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 65 ms and then it took 826 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

travelpicks.com performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

55/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value420 ms

66/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.6 s

81/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

travelpicks.com

65 ms

travelpicks.com

89 ms

css

35 ms

jquery.min.js

61 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Travelpicks.com, 26% (17 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Foxiz.themeruby.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (194 ms) belongs to the original domain Travelpicks.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 224.5 kB (17%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Travelpicks.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 916.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 224.2 kB

  • Original 272.3 kB
  • After minification 272.3 kB
  • After compression 48.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 224.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 916.5 kB
  • After minification 916.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Travel Picks images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 248 B

  • Original 94.9 kB
  • After minification 94.9 kB
  • After compression 94.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (30%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

33

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Travel Picks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

travelpicks.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

travelpicks.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

travelpicks.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Travelpicks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Travelpicks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Travel Picks. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: