7 sec in total
437 ms
4.5 sec
2 sec
Visit traversia.net now to see the best up-to-date Traversia content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about traversia.net
Driving travel tech innovations for TMCs, B2B Resellers & Corporates.
Visit traversia.netWe analyzed Traversia.net page load time and found that the first response time was 437 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
traversia.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value7.4 s
4/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value570 ms
52/100
30%
Value0.255
48/100
15%
Value9.5 s
30/100
10%
437 ms
1216 ms
815 ms
1020 ms
825 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Traversia.net, 11% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Unpkg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Traversia.net.
Page size can be reduced by 305.0 kB (27%)
1.1 MB
818.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Traversia.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 451.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 254.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 254.1 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Traversia needs image optimization as it can save up to 50.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 190 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 14 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Traversia.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (49%)
55
28
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Traversia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
traversia.net
437 ms
traversia.net
1216 ms
ionicons.min.css
815 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1020 ms
animate.css
825 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
828 ms
swiper-bundle.min.css
802 ms
style.css
1213 ms
scroll-baar.css
812 ms
navigation_css.css
842 ms
jquery.min.js
50 ms
lottie-player.js
58 ms
lottie-player.js
16 ms
jquery.min.js
35 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
838 ms
jquery-3.6.0.min.js
998 ms
jquery-migrate-3.3.2.min.js
805 ms
modernizr-3.11.2.min.js
825 ms
jquery.waypoints.js
826 ms
ScrollMagic.min.js
995 ms
global.js
1094 ms
wow.min.js
1095 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
1260 ms
tippy.min.js
1260 ms
mailchimp-ajax.js
1260 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
1261 ms
jquery.counterup.js
1259 ms
main.js
1260 ms
nav_js.js
1443 ms
js
65 ms
css2
35 ms
gtm.js
53 ms
dark.png
216 ms
dark.png
395 ms
phone.png
404 ms
mail.png
396 ms
Mobile-App-Development.png
396 ms
Web-Development.png
402 ms
Social-Media-Marketing.png
667 ms
ecommercedevelopment.png
669 ms
Website-Designing.png
670 ms
brand-logo1.jpg
670 ms
brand-logo2.jpg
671 ms
brand-logo3.jpg
673 ms
brand-logo4.jpg
769 ms
brand-logo5.jpg
780 ms
brand-logo6.jpg
781 ms
brand-logo7.jpg
784 ms
brand-logo8.jpg
793 ms
brand-logo9.jpg
795 ms
brand-logo10.jpg
958 ms
brand-logo11.jpg
973 ms
brand-logo12.jpg
975 ms
brand-logo13.jpg
979 ms
avter.png
983 ms
white.png
989 ms
flU8Rqu5zY00QEpyWJYWN6f0.ttf
82 ms
flUhRqu5zY00QEpyWJYWN58AfsNZ.ttf
288 ms
flUhRqu5zY00QEpyWJYWN59Yf8NZ.ttf
199 ms
flUhRqu5zY00QEpyWJYWN59IeMNZ.ttf
164 ms
flUhRqu5zY00QEpyWJYWN59wesNZ.ttf
201 ms
LDI2apCSOBg7S-QT7pbYF8Os.ttf
196 ms
LDI2apCSOBg7S-QT7pa8FsOs.ttf
196 ms
LDI2apCSOBg7S-QT7pb0EMOs.ttf
196 ms
LDIxapCSOBg7S-QT7q4A.ttf
198 ms
LDI2apCSOBg7S-QT7pasEcOs.ttf
199 ms
ionicons28b5.ttf
1405 ms
Mobile-App-Development.png
277 ms
Web-Development.png
394 ms
plane-data.png
562 ms
1-1-1920x454.png
1327 ms
Social-Media-Marketing.png
348 ms
ecommercedevelopment.png
345 ms
Website-Designing.png
513 ms
brand-logo1.jpg
537 ms
brand-logo2.jpg
546 ms
brand-logo3.jpg
587 ms
brand-logo4.jpg
701 ms
brand-logo5.jpg
491 ms
brand-logo6.jpg
597 ms
brand-logo7.jpg
618 ms
brand-logo8.jpg
626 ms
brand-logo9.jpg
661 ms
brand-logo10.jpg
513 ms
brand-logo11.jpg
602 ms
brand-logo12.jpg
623 ms
brand-logo13.jpg
641 ms
avter.png
669 ms
traversia.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
traversia.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
traversia.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Traversia.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Traversia.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
traversia.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Traversia. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: