Tools & Wizards About Us
treelinetree.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

treelinetree.com

Complete Tree Service & Removal in San Diego | Treeline Tree Service

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

117 ms

Resources Loaded

704 ms

Page Rendered

350 ms

treelinetree.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Treeline Tree content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about treelinetree.com

Treeline Tree offers affordable and complete tree service and removal serving all of San Diego County, including El Cajon, Chula Vista, La Mesa, Poway, Alpine, Ramona and more.

Visit treelinetree.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Treelinetree.com page load time and found that the first response time was 117 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

treelinetree.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.2 s

25/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

treelinetree.com

117 ms

treelinetree.com

137 ms

style.css

89 ms

css

34 ms

style.css

110 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Treelinetree.com, 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (226 ms) belongs to the original domain Treelinetree.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 134.1 kB (5%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Treelinetree.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 106.7 kB

  • Original 130.8 kB
  • After minification 128.3 kB
  • After compression 24.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 106.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 2.7 MB
  • After minification 2.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Treeline Tree images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 16.8 kB

  • Original 129.9 kB
  • After minification 129.9 kB
  • After compression 113.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 16.8 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 7.7 kB

  • Original 34.3 kB
  • After minification 34.1 kB
  • After compression 26.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Treelinetree.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.7 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (59%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Treeline Tree. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

treelinetree.com

treelinetree.com

117 ms

treelinetree.com

treelinetree.com

137 ms

style.css

style.css

89 ms

css

css

34 ms

style.css

style.css

110 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

107 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

226 ms

idle-timer.min.js

idle-timer.min.js

128 ms

custom.js

custom.js

99 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

184 ms

common.js

common.js

197 ms

style.css

style.css

91 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

104 ms

LOGO.png

LOGO.png

86 ms

HOMEPAGE-HEADER-Background.jpg

HOMEPAGE-HEADER-Background.jpg

88 ms

WHY-CHOOSE-TREELINE-Background.jpg

WHY-CHOOSE-TREELINE-Background.jpg

91 ms

VIEW-GALLERY-Background.jpg

VIEW-GALLERY-Background.jpg

89 ms

ISA-Member-Logo.png

ISA-Member-Logo.png

84 ms

main.js

main.js

8 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

94 ms

Accessibility Review

treelinetree.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

treelinetree.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

treelinetree.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Treelinetree.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Treelinetree.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

treelinetree.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Treeline Tree. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: