Tools & Wizards About Us
treeoflife-project.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 4

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 57

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 24% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

treeoflife-project.com

顶盛娱乐app-顶盛娱乐app下载-顶盛app官网

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

105 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

695 ms

treeoflife-project.com screenshot

About Website

Visit treeoflife-project.com now to see the best up-to-date Treeoflife Project content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about treeoflife-project.com

顶盛娱乐app公司，1999年，一批在中央电视台工作过的深谙北京本土文化的优秀影视制作精英组建了影视制作团队，经过几年的努力于2004年4月8日正式成立北京顶盛娱乐app有限公司。顶盛app官网有限公司成立于2014年，专注“商业空间展示”十余载。成立伊始，在广州建立展柜制作厂，熟知展示家具的制作成本和生产工艺。顶盛娱乐app集团的前身大雅（广州）化妆品有限公司创立于2014年，是一家拥有三大国际...

Visit treeoflife-project.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Treeoflife-project.com page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

treeoflife-project.com performance score

4

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value25.2 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value52.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value25.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,310 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.529

14/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value39.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

treeoflife-project.com

105 ms

css

35 ms

font-awesome.min.css

181 ms

bootstrap.min.css

184 ms

main.css

74 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Treeoflife-project.com, 13% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (529 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.snipcart.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 260.3 kB (18%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Treeoflife-project.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 21.1 kB

  • Original 27.5 kB
  • After minification 21.5 kB
  • After compression 6.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.0 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 150.4 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Treeoflife Project needs image optimization as it can save up to 150.4 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 70.5 kB

  • Original 169.8 kB
  • After minification 164.6 kB
  • After compression 99.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 70.5 kB or 42% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 18.2 kB

  • Original 27.4 kB
  • After minification 22.4 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Treeoflife-project.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.2 kB or 66% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (45%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Treeoflife Project. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

treeoflife-project.com

treeoflife-project.com

105 ms

css

css

35 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

181 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

184 ms

main.css

main.css

74 ms

hover.css

hover.css

132 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

143 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

142 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

92 ms

style.css

style.css

143 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

140 ms

lity.css

lity.css

139 ms

lity.js

lity.js

141 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

140 ms

snipcart.js

snipcart.js

312 ms

snipcart.min.css

snipcart.min.css

529 ms

lightbox-plus-jquery.min.js

lightbox-plus-jquery.min.js

310 ms

css

css

54 ms

css

css

76 ms

css

css

124 ms

css

css

135 ms

css

css

148 ms

background-main.jpg

background-main.jpg

488 ms

background.png

background.png

255 ms

close.png

close.png

256 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

257 ms

prev.png

prev.png

255 ms

next.png

next.png

255 ms

awakeningcall.jpg

awakeningcall.jpg

257 ms

Plexus.jpg

Plexus.jpg

253 ms

videothumb.jpg

videothumb.jpg

276 ms

Carlos.jpg

Carlos.jpg

249 ms

Eric.jpg

Eric.jpg

252 ms

Fernando.jpg

Fernando.jpg

265 ms

top-bg.png

top-bg.png

264 ms

CDThumb.jpg

CDThumb.jpg

266 ms

SignedCDThumb.jpg

SignedCDThumb.jpg

266 ms

CD+PictureThumb.jpg

CD+PictureThumb.jpg

266 ms

DigitalDownloadThumb.jpg

DigitalDownloadThumb.jpg

379 ms

FB.png

FB.png

266 ms

tw.png

tw.png

268 ms

Email.png

Email.png

268 ms

ieVi2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-32meKCM.ttf

ieVi2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-32meKCM.ttf

111 ms

ieVl2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-59U.ttf

ieVl2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-59U.ttf

143 ms

ke8iOgUHP1dg-Rmi6RWjbLE_htaZ.ttf

ke8iOgUHP1dg-Rmi6RWjbLE_htaZ.ttf

143 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

108 ms

Accessibility Review

treeoflife-project.com accessibility score

57

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

treeoflife-project.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

treeoflife-project.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Treeoflife-project.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Treeoflife-project.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

treeoflife-project.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Treeoflife Project. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: