Tools & Wizards About Us
trendpack.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 87

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

trendpack.in

Trend

Page Load Speed

311 ms in total

First Response

12 ms

Resources Loaded

124 ms

Page Rendered

175 ms

trendpack.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Trend Pack content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about trendpack.in

Visit trendpack.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Trendpack.in page load time and found that the first response time was 12 ms and then it took 299 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

trendpack.in performance score

87

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

58/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.113

86/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

trendpack.in

12 ms

trendpack.in

39 ms

vendors.bundle.css

19 ms

styles.css

15 ms

logo.png

11 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Trendpack.in and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (41 ms) belongs to the original domain Trendpack.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 640.1 kB (50%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

635.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Trendpack.in main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 33.0 kB

  • Original 41.8 kB
  • After minification 34.8 kB
  • After compression 8.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.0 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 607.1 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 626.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Trend Pack needs image optimization as it can save up to 607.1 kB or 49% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (24%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Trend Pack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

trendpack.in

trendpack.in

12 ms

trendpack.in

trendpack.in

39 ms

vendors.bundle.css

vendors.bundle.css

19 ms

styles.css

styles.css

15 ms

logo.png

logo.png

11 ms

line.svg

line.svg

25 ms

hero.jpg

hero.jpg

27 ms

shape.png

shape.png

29 ms

arrow-top-right.svg

arrow-top-right.svg

26 ms

Stand_up_pouch_650x400.png

Stand_up_pouch_650x400.png

27 ms

Three_side_seal_pouch_650x400.png

Three_side_seal_pouch_650x400.png

29 ms

3.png

3.png

29 ms

4.png

4.png

30 ms

5.png

5.png

31 ms

6-1.png

6-1.png

32 ms

7.png

7.png

33 ms

Center_seal_pouch_with_aluminium_window_650x400.png

Center_seal_pouch_with_aluminium_window_650x400.png

34 ms

1.svg

1.svg

36 ms

2.svg

2.svg

41 ms

3.svg

3.svg

39 ms

Certificate.png

Certificate.png

40 ms

1-2.jpg

1-2.jpg

17 ms

circle-checked.svg

circle-checked.svg

20 ms

Accessibility Review

trendpack.in accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

trendpack.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

trendpack.in SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trendpack.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Trendpack.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

trendpack.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Trend Pack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: