Tools & Wizards About Us
trianglesecurity.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

trianglesecurity.net

Home Security Systems & Business Security Raleigh by Triangle Security

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

70 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

280 ms

trianglesecurity.net screenshot

About Website

Visit trianglesecurity.net now to see the best up-to-date Triangle Security content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about trianglesecurity.net

We offer the best business and home security systems in Raleigh, Durham, Cary, and throughout the Triangle. Our video surveillance, fire protection, wireless...

Visit trianglesecurity.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Trianglesecurity.net page load time and found that the first response time was 70 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

trianglesecurity.net performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,010 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.046

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.9 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

trianglesecurity.net

70 ms

www.trianglesecurity.net

92 ms

wpforge-fonts.css

39 ms

normalize.css

53 ms

foundation.css

57 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Trianglesecurity.net, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (367 ms) belongs to the original domain Trianglesecurity.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 148.9 kB (13%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Trianglesecurity.net main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 536.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 72.3 kB

  • Original 87.9 kB
  • After minification 85.5 kB
  • After compression 15.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 8.7 kB

  • Original 536.9 kB
  • After minification 528.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Triangle Security images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 40.4 kB

  • Original 443.6 kB
  • After minification 443.6 kB
  • After compression 403.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 27.5 kB

  • Original 120.1 kB
  • After minification 118.9 kB
  • After compression 92.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Trianglesecurity.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.5 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (71%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Triangle Security. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

trianglesecurity.net

trianglesecurity.net

70 ms

www.trianglesecurity.net

www.trianglesecurity.net

92 ms

wpforge-fonts.css

wpforge-fonts.css

39 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

53 ms

foundation.css

foundation.css

57 ms

style.css

style.css

56 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

65 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

68 ms

css

css

37 ms

animate.css

animate.css

157 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

101 ms

css

css

25 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

94 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

91 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

93 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

93 ms

greensock.js

greensock.js

131 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

133 ms

formreset.min.css

formreset.min.css

130 ms

formsmain.min.css

formsmain.min.css

130 ms

readyclass.min.css

readyclass.min.css

135 ms

browsers.min.css

browsers.min.css

167 ms

foundation.min.js

foundation.min.js

169 ms

functions.js

functions.js

168 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

169 ms

sitescripts.js

sitescripts.js

174 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

194 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

211 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

209 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

210 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

209 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

211 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

232 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

246 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

247 ms

api.js

api.js

38 ms

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

245 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

247 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

250 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

271 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

367 ms

style.css

style.css

234 ms

triangle-security-90006811.png

triangle-security-90006811.png

26 ms

header-gradient.png

header-gradient.png

59 ms

triangle-security-logo.png

triangle-security-logo.png

56 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

57 ms

automated-control-app.png

automated-control-app.png

118 ms

formbg.png

formbg.png

47 ms

font

font

21 ms

font

font

41 ms

font

font

40 ms

font

font

42 ms

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

44 ms

callouts-bg.png

callouts-bg.png

59 ms

bullet.png

bullet.png

58 ms

homepage-callout-bg.png

homepage-callout-bg.png

60 ms

consultation-bg.png

consultation-bg.png

60 ms

font

font

31 ms

triangle-security-90006811.js

triangle-security-90006811.js

28 ms

footer-bg.png

footer-bg.png

46 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

30 ms

skin.css

skin.css

54 ms

legacy.min.css

legacy.min.css

25 ms

Accessibility Review

trianglesecurity.net accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

trianglesecurity.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

trianglesecurity.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trianglesecurity.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Trianglesecurity.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

trianglesecurity.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Triangle Security. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: