8.6 sec in total
2.6 sec
5.7 sec
380 ms
Click here to check amazing Trihead content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about trihead.com
Premium WordPress designs without a hefty price tag? triHead can provide the perfect, affordable web design solution in Houston!
Visit trihead.comWe analyzed Trihead.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
trihead.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value15.2 s
0/100
25%
Value14.7 s
1/100
10%
Value2,750 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value14.5 s
8/100
10%
2561 ms
173 ms
239 ms
165 ms
39 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Trihead.com, 11% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Trihead.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (67%)
2.9 MB
954.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Trihead.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 176.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 176.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 66.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Trihead needs image optimization as it can save up to 66.6 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 969.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 969.6 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 684.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Trihead.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 684.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (67%)
67
22
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Trihead. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
trihead.com
2561 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
173 ms
dashicons.min.css
239 ms
jquery-ui-dialog.min.css
165 ms
css
39 ms
css
60 ms
ctl_styles.css
189 ms
form.min.css
344 ms
settings.css
411 ms
css
49 ms
style.css
510 ms
font-awesome.css
350 ms
ilightbox.css
341 ms
animations.css
412 ms
woocommerce.css
467 ms
captcha_form_main.css
447 ms
css
46 ms
jquery.js
617 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
503 ms
core.min.js
527 ms
widget.min.js
576 ms
mouse.min.js
549 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
639 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
664 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
638 ms
woocommerce-add-to-cart.js
648 ms
tooltip.min.js
695 ms
form.min.js
595 ms
captcha_form_main.js
545 ms
api.js
35 ms
resizable.min.js
141 ms
draggable.min.js
141 ms
button.min.js
147 ms
position.min.js
146 ms
dialog.min.js
147 ms
wpdialog.min.js
300 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
183 ms
woocommerce.min.js
309 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
325 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
306 ms
comment-reply.min.js
301 ms
main.min.js
745 ms
wp-embed.min.js
367 ms
recaptcha__en.js
79 ms
analytics.js
70 ms
triHead-logo-long.png
441 ms
triHead-retina.png
442 ms
transparent.png
442 ms
home_seo_slider_woman.png
460 ms
home_seo_slider_graph.png
443 ms
home_seo_slider_graph_dots.png
442 ms
home_seo_slider_grap_hline.png
443 ms
home_seo_browser-e1458160949195.png
459 ms
sample-captcha.png
444 ms
logo-signatureflat.png
444 ms
fibre.png
492 ms
7YGmE4Ls5b94ct65u07hVQLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.woff
48 ms
0XxGQsSc1g4rdRdjJKZrNL3hpw3pgy2gAi-Ip7WPMi0.woff
62 ms
qpy-UiLNKP-VfOdbcs6r6-vvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.woff
76 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6bO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
78 ms
icomoon.woff
453 ms
CrYjSnGjrRCn0pd9VQsnFOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.woff
76 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOLO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
76 ms
napvkewXG9Gqby5vwGHICBbnBKKEOwRKgsHDreGcocg.woff
89 ms
OttjxgcoEsufOGSINYBGLbrIa-7acMAeDBVuclsi6Gc.woff
77 ms
fc.woff
488 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
525 ms
collect
34 ms
collect
62 ms
ga-audiences
19 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
109 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
130 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
168 ms
anchor
29 ms
styles__ltr.css
7 ms
s5G5viF55Zd620FDUE2o6cwnsrT1pToaK6kVmkloWvE.js
8 ms
webworker.js
39 ms
logo_48.png
7 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
16 ms
recaptcha__en.js
7 ms
loader.gif
136 ms
shadow-top.png
68 ms
shadow-bottom.png
67 ms
trihead.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
trihead.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
trihead.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trihead.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Trihead.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
trihead.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Trihead. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: