Tools & Wizards About Us
trilogywriting.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

trilogywriting.com

Medical Writing Consultancy - Trilogy Writing & Consulting GmbH

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

570 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

431 ms

trilogywriting.com screenshot

About Website

Visit trilogywriting.com now to see the best up-to-date Trilogy Writing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about trilogywriting.com

Partners for Medical Writing - Trilogy Writing & Consulting GmbH - providing all necessary regulatory documentation in support of your clinical development.

Visit trilogywriting.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Trilogywriting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 570 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

trilogywriting.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value990 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

trilogywriting.com

570 ms

js

60 ms

frontend.css

77 ms

style.css

152 ms

select2.min.css

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Trilogywriting.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (742 ms) belongs to the original domain Trilogywriting.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 489.2 kB (12%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

3.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Trilogywriting.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 90.0 kB

  • Original 110.0 kB
  • After minification 108.4 kB
  • After compression 20.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 398.4 kB

  • Original 3.9 MB
  • After minification 3.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Trilogy Writing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 81 B

  • Original 133.3 kB
  • After minification 133.3 kB
  • After compression 133.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 715 B

  • Original 56.9 kB
  • After minification 56.9 kB
  • After compression 56.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Trilogywriting.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (85%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Trilogy Writing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

trilogywriting.com

trilogywriting.com

570 ms

js

js

60 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

77 ms

style.css

style.css

152 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

24 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

267 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

275 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

277 ms

post-6.css

post-6.css

279 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

279 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

341 ms

widget-theme-elements.min.css

widget-theme-elements.min.css

349 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

356 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

357 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

358 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

359 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

415 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

423 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

431 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

431 ms

fadeInLeft.min.css

fadeInLeft.min.css

433 ms

widget-slides.min.css

widget-slides.min.css

434 ms

widget-video.min.css

widget-video.min.css

490 ms

widget-divider.min.css

widget-divider.min.css

495 ms

post-11403.css

post-11403.css

506 ms

post-11413.css

post-11413.css

507 ms

post-11920.css

post-11920.css

510 ms

default.css

default.css

511 ms

google-fonts-1.css

google-fonts-1.css

563 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

643 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

582 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

33 ms

cookieControl-8.x.min.js

cookieControl-8.x.min.js

468 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

582 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

584 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

585 ms

pixel-cat.min.js

pixel-cat.min.js

636 ms

video.js

video.js

735 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

735 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

735 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

672 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

592 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

477 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

469 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

466 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

472 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

515 ms

Trilogy_logo-01.png

Trilogy_logo-01.png

188 ms

Trilogy-Douglas-Slide-2560-%C3%97-1200-px.png

Trilogy-Douglas-Slide-2560-%C3%97-1200-px.png

500 ms

Final-Trilogy-Julia-Slide-2560-%C3%97-1200-px.png

Final-Trilogy-Julia-Slide-2560-%C3%97-1200-px.png

742 ms

Trilogy-Lisa-Slide-2560-%C3%97-1200-px.png

Trilogy-Lisa-Slide-2560-%C3%97-1200-px.png

517 ms

PIG-TICK-YouTube-cover-768x432.jpg

PIG-TICK-YouTube-cover-768x432.jpg

130 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

289 ms

Device-September-Medium.woff

Device-September-Medium.woff

192 ms

Device-September-Heavy.woff

Device-September-Heavy.woff

214 ms

v

v

510 ms

Accessibility Review

trilogywriting.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

trilogywriting.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

trilogywriting.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trilogywriting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Trilogywriting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

trilogywriting.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Trilogy Writing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: