Tools & Wizards About Us
trim.co screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

trim.co

trim.co – Haircuts at Work, The Ultimate Employee Benefit

Page Load Speed

771 ms in total

First Response

89 ms

Resources Loaded

616 ms

Page Rendered

66 ms

trim.co screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Trim content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about trim.co

trim.co is transforming the idea of work-life balance with convenient, affordable onsite haircut services to make employee lives easier and more rewarding.

Visit trim.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Trim.co page load time and found that the first response time was 89 ms and then it took 682 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

trim.co performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.49

17/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.0 s

65/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

trim.co

89 ms

dnj5sjz.css

97 ms

formidableforms.css

69 ms

style.min.css

85 ms

font-awesome.min.css

53 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Trim.co, 22% (7 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 3% (1 request) were made to P.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (208 ms) belongs to the original domain Trim.co.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 38.2 kB (55%)

Content Size

68.8 kB

After Optimization

30.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Trim.co main page is 68.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 41.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 20.6 kB

  • Original 27.0 kB
  • After minification 25.7 kB
  • After compression 6.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 17.6 kB

  • Original 41.7 kB
  • After minification 24.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Trim needs image optimization as it can save up to 17.6 kB or 42% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (80%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Trim. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

trim.co

trim.co

89 ms

dnj5sjz.css

dnj5sjz.css

97 ms

formidableforms.css

formidableforms.css

69 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

85 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

53 ms

bootstrap-front.css

bootstrap-front.css

63 ms

counter-column.css

counter-column.css

86 ms

style.css

style.css

82 ms

slick.css

slick.css

103 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

133 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

141 ms

waypoint.js

waypoint.js

145 ms

counter_nscript.js

counter_nscript.js

134 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

206 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

146 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

181 ms

jquery.hoverIntent.min.js

jquery.hoverIntent.min.js

202 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

196 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

208 ms

p.css

p.css

22 ms

main.css

main.css

73 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

72 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

123 ms

trimco-orange.png

trimco-orange.png

86 ms

trimco-white-1.png

trimco-white-1.png

50 ms

locks-of-love-horizontal-logo.png

locks-of-love-horizontal-logo.png

57 ms

d

d

4 ms

d

d

8 ms

d

d

19 ms

d

d

27 ms

d

d

26 ms

d

d

20 ms

Accessibility Review

trim.co accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

trim.co best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

trim.co SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trim.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Trim.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

trim.co

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Trim. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: