Tools & Wizards About Us
trimpak.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

trimpak.com

TRIMPAK | Custom Cabinets | Cabinet Reface | Kitchen Remodel | Bathroom Remodel | Reno NV | Sparks NV | Kitchen Cabinets | TV Cabinets | Fireplace Man...

Page Load Speed

20.4 sec in total

First Response

55 ms

Resources Loaded

20.2 sec

Page Rendered

187 ms

trimpak.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing TRIMPAK content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about trimpak.com

Custom Cabinets made in Reno NV. We can Remodel your Kitchen or Bathroom. We reface Kitchen cabinets. We make custom Furniture. Doors and Crown Moulding

Visit trimpak.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Trimpak.com page load time and found that the first response time was 55 ms and then it took 20.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

trimpak.com performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

trimpak.com

55 ms

ice.js

31 ms

ice.conf.js

39 ms

ga.js

8 ms

get_flash_player.gif

20068 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Trimpak.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Adobe.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.1 sec) relates to the external source Adobe.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 203.5 kB (23%)

Content Size

871.4 kB

After Optimization

667.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Trimpak.com main page is 871.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 825.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 15.6 kB

  • Original 19.9 kB
  • After minification 15.9 kB
  • After compression 4.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.9 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 180.3 kB

  • Original 825.4 kB
  • After minification 645.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, TRIMPAK needs image optimization as it can save up to 180.3 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 26.1 kB
  • After minification 20.8 kB
  • After compression 18.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.5 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

29

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TRIMPAK. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

trimpak.com

trimpak.com

55 ms

ice.js

ice.js

31 ms

ice.conf.js

ice.conf.js

39 ms

ga.js

ga.js

8 ms

get_flash_player.gif

get_flash_player.gif

20068 ms

BackgroundTest.jpg

BackgroundTest.jpg

87 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

34 ms

Trimpak-Template_r1_c1.png

Trimpak-Template_r1_c1.png

36 ms

Trimpak-Template_r2_c1.png

Trimpak-Template_r2_c1.png

43 ms

Trimpak-Template_r3_c1.png

Trimpak-Template_r3_c1.png

36 ms

mainpage+.png

mainpage+.png

66 ms

services+.png

services+.png

62 ms

Design+.png

Design+.png

55 ms

projects+.png

projects+.png

53 ms

Contacts+.png

Contacts+.png

59 ms

photogallery+.png

photogallery+.png

71 ms

Trimpak-Template_r3_c2.png

Trimpak-Template_r3_c2.png

70 ms

BA_5sm.jpg

BA_5sm.jpg

76 ms

BA_1_SM.jpg

BA_1_SM.jpg

78 ms

BA_2sm.jpg

BA_2sm.jpg

98 ms

BA_3sm.jpg

BA_3sm.jpg

87 ms

BA_4sm.jpg

BA_4sm.jpg

93 ms

visa.jpg

visa.jpg

93 ms

Trimpak-Template_r4_c1.png

Trimpak-Template_r4_c1.png

102 ms

Trimpak-Template_r5_c1.png

Trimpak-Template_r5_c1.png

112 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

mainpage-.png

mainpage-.png

24 ms

services-.png

services-.png

31 ms

Design-.png

Design-.png

28 ms

projects-.png

projects-.png

53 ms

Contacts-.png

Contacts-.png

32 ms

photogallery-.png

photogallery-.png

17 ms

Accessibility Review

trimpak.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

trimpak.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

trimpak.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trimpak.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Trimpak.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

trimpak.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of TRIMPAK. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: