Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

trioplus.co.uk

Temporary Protection Products Supplier - Trio Plus

Page Load Speed

21.7 sec in total

First Response

225 ms

Resources Loaded

21.2 sec

Page Rendered

215 ms

trioplus.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit trioplus.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Trio Plus content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about trioplus.co.uk

Explore Trio Plus for versatile temporary protection solutions. Catering to both domestic and commercial needs. Free UK mainland shipping!

Visit trioplus.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Trioplus.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 225 ms and then it took 21.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

trioplus.co.uk performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

72/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.044

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

41/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

trioplus.co.uk

225 ms

trioplus.co.uk

80 ms

www.trioplus.co.uk

538 ms

slide-show.css

169 ms

core.css

197 ms

Our browser made a total of 113 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Trioplus.co.uk, 15% (17 requests) were made to Cdn9.bigcommerce.com and 14% (16 requests) were made to Cdn10.bigcommerce.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.8 sec) relates to the external source Widgets.collect-reviews.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 134.9 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Trioplus.co.uk main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 51.9 kB

  • Original 66.2 kB
  • After minification 59.6 kB
  • After compression 14.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 25.4 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Trio Plus images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 57.6 kB

  • Original 314.5 kB
  • After minification 314.4 kB
  • After compression 256.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 57.6 kB or 18% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 71 (67%)

Requests Now

106

After Optimization

35

The browser has sent 106 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Trio Plus. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

trioplus.co.uk accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

trioplus.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

trioplus.co.uk SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trioplus.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Trioplus.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Trio Plus. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: