Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 42

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

tripandtrek.com

:: TRIP & TREK :: ?š???ҧ?ͧ???Թ?ҧ ::

Page Load Speed

7.5 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

6 sec

Page Rendered

367 ms

tripandtrek.com screenshot

About Website

Visit tripandtrek.com now to see the best up-to-date TRIP And TREK content for Thailand and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tripandtrek.com

Travel in Thai - ??ͧ?????仡Ѻ??? ?????ʪ??Ե??觸????ҵ?

Visit tripandtrek.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tripandtrek.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tripandtrek.com performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

38/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

65/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.13

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tripandtrek.com

1135 ms

winpopup001.js

840 ms

clearfield.js

854 ms

autosize.js

878 ms

TnTStyle.css

1134 ms

Our browser made a total of 117 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Tripandtrek.com, 15% (18 requests) were made to Banner.agoda.com and 9% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Tripandtrek.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 379.0 kB (18%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Tripandtrek.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 103.3 kB

  • Original 116.5 kB
  • After minification 103.1 kB
  • After compression 13.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.4 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 103.3 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 35.2 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. TRIP And TREK images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 87.3 kB

  • Original 176.2 kB
  • After minification 161.4 kB
  • After compression 88.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 87.3 kB or 50% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 153.3 kB

  • Original 190.1 kB
  • After minification 176.5 kB
  • After compression 36.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tripandtrek.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 153.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (41%)

Requests Now

116

After Optimization

68

The browser has sent 116 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TRIP And TREK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

tripandtrek.com accessibility score

42

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

tripandtrek.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

tripandtrek.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    HY

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-874

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tripandtrek.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Armenian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Tripandtrek.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-874. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of TRIP And TREK. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: