Tools & Wizards About Us
tripspark.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

tripspark.com

Fixed Route Software | Paratransit Software | NEMT Software

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

146 ms

Resources Loaded

777 ms

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

tripspark.com screenshot

About Website

Visit tripspark.com now to see the best up-to-date Tripspark content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tripspark.com

Fixed route software, demand response and paratransit scheduling software, non-emergency medical transportation scheduling software and ridesharing management software solutions for transit agencies.

Visit tripspark.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tripspark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 146 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tripspark.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

87/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value900 ms

32/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.2 s

25/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tripspark.com

146 ms

www.tripspark.com

154 ms

style.min.css

110 ms

theme.1723836385.css

147 ms

jquery.min.js

133 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Tripspark.com, 13% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Kit.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (218 ms) belongs to the original domain Tripspark.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 132.2 kB (18%)

Content Size

749.2 kB

After Optimization

617.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Tripspark.com main page is 749.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 602.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 125.2 kB

  • Original 141.5 kB
  • After minification 117.7 kB
  • After compression 16.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.7 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.2 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 602.9 kB
  • After minification 595.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tripspark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 13 B

  • Original 4.8 kB
  • After minification 4.8 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (50%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tripspark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

tripspark.com

tripspark.com

146 ms

www.tripspark.com

www.tripspark.com

154 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

110 ms

theme.1723836385.css

theme.1723836385.css

147 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

133 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

102 ms

js

js

62 ms

modernizr-custom.js

modernizr-custom.js

131 ms

main.756aa271086402d604fd.js

main.756aa271086402d604fd.js

199 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

218 ms

58539849ba.js

58539849ba.js

217 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

122 ms

icon-chevron.svg

icon-chevron.svg

112 ms

tripspark-logo-blue.png

tripspark-logo-blue.png

111 ms

customer-map-north-america-1024x1024.webp

customer-map-north-america-1024x1024.webp

140 ms

tripspark-transit-software-fixed-route-paratransit-rideshare-nemt-home-banner-scaled-aspect-ratio-1340-590-scaled.jpg

tripspark-transit-software-fixed-route-paratransit-rideshare-nemt-home-banner-scaled-aspect-ratio-1340-590-scaled.jpg

194 ms

Accessibility Review

tripspark.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

tripspark.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

tripspark.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tripspark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tripspark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tripspark.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tripspark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: