388 ms in total
58 ms
194 ms
136 ms
Welcome to trivex.net homepage info - get ready to check Trivex best content right away, or after learning these important things about trivex.net
founder of @envoy. formerly systems engineer at Twitter and Google.
Visit trivex.netWe analyzed Trivex.net page load time and found that the first response time was 58 ms and then it took 330 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
trivex.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value15.2 s
0/100
25%
Value4.6 s
71/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.8 s
35/100
10%
58 ms
5 ms
31 ms
3 ms
15 ms
Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Trivex.net, 14% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (95 ms) belongs to the original domain Trivex.net.
Page size can be reduced by 36.7 kB (50%)
72.9 kB
36.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Trivex.net main page is 72.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 52.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.1 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Trivex needs image optimization as it can save up to 24.1 kB or 46% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 971 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 971 B or 14% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
13
13
The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Trivex. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
trivex.net
58 ms
urchin.js
5 ms
gmailicon.png
31 ms
__utm.gif
3 ms
download.png
15 ms
more.png
13 ms
screen.png
22 ms
discuss.png
17 ms
anytextfileicon.png
18 ms
source.png
30 ms
helpfileicon.png
45 ms
openofficeicon.png
34 ms
mircicon.png
24 ms
wpdicon.png
95 ms
trivex.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[role]s do not have all required [aria-*] attributes
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
ARIA IDs are not unique
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
trivex.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
trivex.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
WINDOWS-1252
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trivex.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Trivex.net main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
trivex.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Trivex. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: