Tools & Wizards About Us
trl.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

trl.co.uk

TRL | THE FUTURE OF TRANSPORT

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

157 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

530 ms

trl.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit trl.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date TRL content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about trl.co.uk

THE FUTURE OF TRANSPORT

Visit trl.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Trl.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 157 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

trl.co.uk performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value750 ms

39/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

trl.co.uk

157 ms

www.trl.co.uk

740 ms

bootstrap.min.css

44 ms

df597defd3.js

84 ms

style.css

84 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Trl.co.uk, 7% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Trl.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 243.0 kB (5%)

Content Size

5.1 MB

After Optimization

4.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Trl.co.uk main page is 5.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 60.1 kB

  • Original 71.8 kB
  • After minification 50.1 kB
  • After compression 11.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.6 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 132.2 kB

  • Original 4.7 MB
  • After minification 4.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. TRL images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 43.1 kB

  • Original 311.6 kB
  • After minification 311.6 kB
  • After compression 268.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 43.1 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 7.6 kB

  • Original 21.2 kB
  • After minification 21.2 kB
  • After compression 13.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Trl.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.6 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (33%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

38

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TRL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

trl.co.uk

trl.co.uk

157 ms

www.trl.co.uk

www.trl.co.uk

740 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

44 ms

df597defd3.js

df597defd3.js

84 ms

style.css

style.css

84 ms

carousel.css

carousel.css

163 ms

trl-styles.css

trl-styles.css

248 ms

jquery-simple-mobilemenu-slide.css

jquery-simple-mobilemenu-slide.css

346 ms

js

js

64 ms

171929.js

171929.js

59 ms

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

jquery-3.4.1.min.js

604 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

36 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

51 ms

jquery-simple-mobilemenu.js

jquery-simple-mobilemenu.js

401 ms

main.js

main.js

450 ms

checkCookieConsent.js

checkCookieConsent.js

450 ms

api.js

api.js

52 ms

df597defd3.css

df597defd3.css

43 ms

font-awesome-css.min.css

font-awesome-css.min.css

13 ms

js

js

50 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

121 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

98 ms

trl-logo.png

trl-logo.png

123 ms

trl-software.jpg

trl-software.jpg

679 ms

crash-investigation.jpg

crash-investigation.jpg

540 ms

smll.jpg

smll.jpg

586 ms

eco-stars_latest.jpg

eco-stars_latest.jpg

333 ms

Pavement-Survey.jpg

Pavement-Survey.jpg

286 ms

trl-india.jpg

trl-india.jpg

397 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

368 ms

3b0ae6af94805b08b11cdf1d97c47dce.woff

3b0ae6af94805b08b11cdf1d97c47dce.woff

482 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

56 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

28 ms

popularLinks

popularLinks

194 ms

latestContent

latestContent

367 ms

currentProjects

currentProjects

814 ms

pollWidgetQuestion

pollWidgetQuestion

848 ms

featuredArticle

featuredArticle

912 ms

bindFooter

bindFooter

396 ms

activetravelaudits.jpg

activetravelaudits.jpg

723 ms

zimbabwe.jpg

zimbabwe.jpg

818 ms

asPECT_1.jpg

asPECT_1.jpg

818 ms

climate-emergency-support.jpg

climate-emergency-support.jpg

1080 ms

e-scooter-testing.jpg

e-scooter-testing.jpg

768 ms

iRAP-service-for-LAs_2.jpg

iRAP-service-for-LAs_2.jpg

1101 ms

website-image---updated.JPG

website-image---updated.JPG

894 ms

MandE.jpg

MandE.jpg

867 ms

p6a-Post-constr-monitor.JPG

p6a-Post-constr-monitor.JPG

1628 ms

Impactors_1.jpg

Impactors_1.jpg

1055 ms

electric-car-charging.jpg

electric-car-charging.jpg

1621 ms

default-img.jpg

default-img.jpg

247 ms

trl_logo_alt.png

trl_logo_alt.png

82 ms

CAM-supply-chain.jpg

CAM-supply-chain.jpg

415 ms

in-use-monitoring.jpg

in-use-monitoring.jpg

743 ms

UNHCR.jpg

UNHCR.jpg

798 ms

CAV-safety-approvals.jpg

CAV-safety-approvals.jpg

816 ms

NRMM2.jpg

NRMM2.jpg

725 ms

sub-tropical-regions.jpg

sub-tropical-regions.jpg

849 ms

bus-london_5_3.jpg

bus-london_5_3.jpg

949 ms

PACTS-manifestop2.jpg

PACTS-manifestop2.jpg

892 ms

Accessibility Review

trl.co.uk accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

trl.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

trl.co.uk SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trl.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Trl.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

trl.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of TRL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: