8.1 sec in total
551 ms
4.3 sec
3.3 sec
Welcome to truemark.dev homepage info - get ready to check Truemark best content right away, or after learning these important things about truemark.dev
Outsource your project without compromising on code quality. We have been acing communication and on time delivery with remote teams in Nepal.
Visit truemark.devWe analyzed Truemark.dev page load time and found that the first response time was 551 ms and then it took 7.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
truemark.dev performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value10.6 s
0/100
25%
Value11.6 s
4/100
10%
Value450 ms
63/100
30%
Value0.151
76/100
15%
Value50.0 s
0/100
10%
551 ms
1288 ms
83 ms
98 ms
185 ms
Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Truemark.dev, 6% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Truemark.dev.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (40%)
3.7 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Truemark.dev main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 324.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 324.5 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Truemark needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 35% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (25%)
16
12
The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Truemark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
truemark.dev
551 ms
www.truemark.dev
1288 ms
css
83 ms
analytics.js
98 ms
programming-0a2b6c61c14027a8aa3366f481d6d381.svg
185 ms
online-marketing-014cc8ba652cd997b0f9a308ab5dcc40.svg
813 ms
polyfill-0ca315ea9c50d111edf0.js
948 ms
app-633034c69ba085642e96.js
36 ms
framework-4fbf61163e8ebdb26ef7.js
1676 ms
webpack-runtime-d63b2f62d5aa761ebd06.js
484 ms
natalieglebova-com-d40d7775fe4e72063c40a6bfa8998965.png
2411 ms
natalie-2e9a96081f1e987ec0f902b9f64d5797.jpg
487 ms
price-insight-e40685b27976d418d5a368b3331f88f7.png
500 ms
nft-marketplace-development-cost.png
993 ms
ux-design-principles.jpg
510 ms
software-development-pricing-model.jpg
518 ms
reneldy-9bcb67c394a740a22c8918feaa7590a2.jpeg
531 ms
contact-us-6b89ecdfdfb20dbccc73db96f293840f.svg
545 ms
truemark.dev accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
truemark.dev best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
truemark.dev SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Truemark.dev can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Truemark.dev main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
truemark.dev
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Truemark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: