Tools & Wizards About Us
tstamp.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

tstamp.ru

Изготовление печатей и штампов в Новосибирске

Page Load Speed

7.5 sec in total

First Response

449 ms

Resources Loaded

6.4 sec

Page Rendered

631 ms

tstamp.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Tstamp content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tstamp.ru

Заказать цветные печати и штампы в Новосибирске. ✅ Компания «Трафарет» изготавливает штампы и печати для организаций (ООО), ИП, врачей, кадастровых инженеров. Цены от 400 руб. Индивидуальный дизайн и ...

Visit tstamp.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Tstamp.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 449 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tstamp.ru performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,600 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.036

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.8 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tstamp.ru

449 ms

tstamp.ru

1616 ms

fonts.css

108 ms

all.css

223 ms

style.css

431 ms

Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Tstamp.ru, 6% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) relates to the external source Widget.cdek.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 241.9 kB (9%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tstamp.ru main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 44.3 kB

  • Original 55.9 kB
  • After minification 52.4 kB
  • After compression 11.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.3 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 182.7 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tstamp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 438.7 kB
  • After minification 438.7 kB
  • After compression 431.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 101.8 kB
  • After minification 101.8 kB
  • After compression 94.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tstamp.ru has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (40%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

44

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tstamp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

tstamp.ru

tstamp.ru

449 ms

tstamp.ru

tstamp.ru

1616 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

108 ms

all.css

all.css

223 ms

style.css

style.css

431 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

442 ms

slick.css

slick.css

342 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

342 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

340 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

337 ms

styles.css

styles.css

450 ms

style.css

style.css

519 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

30 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

450 ms

widjet.js

widjet.js

2487 ms

js

js

79 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

449 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

542 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

548 ms

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

548 ms

common.js

common.js

552 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

556 ms

index.js

index.js

628 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

647 ms

api.js

api.js

73 ms

index.js

index.js

652 ms

tag.js

tag.js

840 ms

logo2.png

logo2.png

183 ms

logo.png

logo.png

171 ms

5206-mci-4_tdtt_portal-medium_3.png

5206-mci-4_tdtt_portal-medium_3.png

460 ms

group-printy-dater_tdtt_portal-medium_2.png

group-printy-dater_tdtt_portal-medium_2.png

643 ms

group-printy-numberer_tdtt_portal-medium_2.png

group-printy-numberer_tdtt_portal-medium_2.png

681 ms

to-service.png

to-service.png

171 ms

ser1.png

ser1.png

203 ms

ser2.png

ser2.png

211 ms

ser3.png

ser3.png

213 ms

pechat.png

pechat.png

524 ms

ju1_009.jpg

ju1_009.jpg

525 ms

ju1_010.jpg

ju1_010.jpg

527 ms

ju1_008.jpg

ju1_008.jpg

749 ms

ju1_007.jpg

ju1_007.jpg

900 ms

ju1_006.jpg

ju1_006.jpg

899 ms

ju1_005.jpg

ju1_005.jpg

736 ms

ju1_003.jpg

ju1_003.jpg

750 ms

ju1_004.jpg

ju1_004.jpg

790 ms

ju1_002.jpg

ju1_002.jpg

946 ms

ju1_001.jpg

ju1_001.jpg

900 ms

why1.png

why1.png

900 ms

why2.png

why2.png

905 ms

why3.png

why3.png

944 ms

why4.png

why4.png

952 ms

why5.png

why5.png

964 ms

why6.png

why6.png

963 ms

why7.png

why7.png

1013 ms

callback.jpg

callback.jpg

1050 ms

part1.png

part1.png

1050 ms

part2.png

part2.png

1059 ms

2gis.png

2gis.png

1070 ms

megafon.png

megafon.png

1072 ms

otkrytie.png

otkrytie.png

1123 ms

pochta.png

pochta.png

1153 ms

specsvjaz.png

specsvjaz.png

1154 ms

rzhd2.png

rzhd2.png

1164 ms

gazprom.png

gazprom.png

1013 ms

seolead.png

seolead.png

1012 ms

manrope-v4-latin-ext_latin_cyrillic-regular.woff

manrope-v4-latin-ext_latin_cyrillic-regular.woff

1069 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

26 ms

manrope-v4-latin-ext_latin_cyrillic-300.woff

manrope-v4-latin-ext_latin_cyrillic-300.woff

1060 ms

manrope-v4-latin-ext_latin_cyrillic-200.woff

manrope-v4-latin-ext_latin_cyrillic-200.woff

1061 ms

anchor

anchor

32 ms

manrope-v4-latin-ext_latin_cyrillic-600.woff

manrope-v4-latin-ext_latin_cyrillic-600.woff

1015 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

4 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

11 ms

8Di8FwPovzey2LLchqkPL-96dOmJYGvPM2IDY7x7VBc.js

8Di8FwPovzey2LLchqkPL-96dOmJYGvPM2IDY7x7VBc.js

41 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

72 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

62 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

48 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

52 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

56 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

11 ms

manrope-v4-latin-ext_latin_cyrillic-700.woff

manrope-v4-latin-ext_latin_cyrillic-700.woff

835 ms

manrope-v4-latin-ext_latin_cyrillic-800.woff

manrope-v4-latin-ext_latin_cyrillic-800.woff

772 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

826 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

849 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

734 ms

advert.gif

advert.gif

756 ms

sync_cookie_image_decide

sync_cookie_image_decide

206 ms

Accessibility Review

tstamp.ru accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

tstamp.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

tstamp.ru SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tstamp.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tstamp.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tstamp.ru

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tstamp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: