4.1 sec in total
653 ms
3.3 sec
162 ms
Click here to check amazing Tuck content for Serbia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tuck.rs
Visit tuck.rsWe analyzed Tuck.rs page load time and found that the first response time was 653 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
tuck.rs performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.8 s
0/100
10%
Value13.2 s
0/100
25%
Value14.4 s
1/100
10%
Value490 ms
59/100
30%
Value0.942
3/100
15%
Value17.5 s
4/100
10%
653 ms
213 ms
218 ms
216 ms
324 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Tuck.rs, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (972 ms) belongs to the original domain Tuck.rs.
Page size can be reduced by 262.2 kB (49%)
531.5 kB
269.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Tuck.rs main page is 531.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 244.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.5 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tuck images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 203.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 203.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tuck.rs needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (46%)
59
32
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tuck. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
view.php
653 ms
style.css
213 ms
homepage.css
218 ms
jslib.js
216 ms
calendarDateInput.js
324 ms
swfobject.js
219 ms
sIFR-screen.css
220 ms
sifr.js
320 ms
sifr-addons.js
329 ms
mootools.svn.js
966 ms
mootools-release-1.11.js
330 ms
urchin.js
22 ms
bg.gif
430 ms
bg_heder.gif
112 ms
logo_tuck.gif
216 ms
bg_heder_banner.gif
218 ms
1411171711_baner_tuckwood_2.jpg
218 ms
menu.gif
218 ms
bg_menu_sec.gif
220 ms
icon_shope.png
324 ms
icon_home.png
329 ms
icon_maps.png
325 ms
bg_search_input.gif
329 ms
bg_search_button.gif
326 ms
bg_box_top_box3.gif
431 ms
palme_u_snegu.jpg
435 ms
robinsoncrusoe_srb.jpg
433 ms
deadpool_keyart.jpg
435 ms
povratnik-b1.jpg
434 ms
godred.jpg
537 ms
hobit3d.jpg
538 ms
najmracniji_satbr3d.jpg
542 ms
hp7_2br.jpg
542 ms
argo_bluray_box.jpg
544 ms
triologija_mracnog_viteza.jpg
543 ms
paklena_pomorandzabr.jpg
644 ms
mracne_senke_br.jpg
646 ms
logo-facebook1.png
649 ms
filmski_dan_160x300.jpg
972 ms
bg_box_bottom_box3.gif
646 ms
bg_box_top_box4.gif
647 ms
title_tuckwood.gif
747 ms
bg_img_border.gif
748 ms
icon_arrow_blue_lite.gif
751 ms
icon_next_dotty_box4.gif
753 ms
icon_next_dotty_link_dark.gif
745 ms
bg_box_bottom_box4.gif
845 ms
title_videopolis.gif
847 ms
__utm.gif
10 ms
title_novo-kolo.gif
757 ms
bg_img_dvd.gif
658 ms
icon_next_dotty_link_small.gif
657 ms
bg_box_bottom_box4-right.gif
758 ms
icon_shope.gif
759 ms
bg_footer_big.gif
761 ms
bg_footer.gif
660 ms
icon_top.gif
655 ms
bg_footer_title.gif
755 ms
print.css
111 ms
sIFR-print.css
111 ms
tuck.rs accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
tuck.rs best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
tuck.rs SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
SR
SR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tuck.rs can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Serbian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tuck.rs main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tuck.rs
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tuck. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: