Tools & Wizards About Us
tudip.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

tudip.com

Best IT Services | Digital Transformation | Outsourcing - Tudip Technologies

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

10 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

568 ms

tudip.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to tudip.com homepage info - get ready to check Tudip best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about tudip.com

Tudip is a customer-focused, extreme technology, IT services company, that helps clients to achieve Serenity through Integrity and Innovation. We deploy the best solutions to our clients with innovati...

Visit tudip.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tudip.com page load time and found that the first response time was 10 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tudip.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,690 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.9 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tudip.com

10 ms

tudip.com

994 ms

js

102 ms

jquery.min.js

58 ms

tudip-custom.js

17 ms

Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Tudip.com, 9% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (994 ms) belongs to the original domain Tudip.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 411.1 kB (31%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

932.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tudip.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 472.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 407.4 kB

  • Original 472.2 kB
  • After minification 458.4 kB
  • After compression 64.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 407.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 6 B

  • Original 427.0 kB
  • After minification 427.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tudip images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 383.5 kB
  • After minification 383.5 kB
  • After compression 379.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 30 B

  • Original 61.2 kB
  • After minification 61.2 kB
  • After compression 61.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tudip.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (71%)

Requests Now

87

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tudip. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

tudip.com

tudip.com

10 ms

tudip.com

tudip.com

994 ms

js

js

102 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

58 ms

tudip-custom.js

tudip-custom.js

17 ms

global.css

global.css

34 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

38 ms

styles.css

styles.css

40 ms

youtube-channel.css

youtube-channel.css

43 ms

testimonial-rotator-style.css

testimonial-rotator-style.css

43 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

45 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

49 ms

flexslider.min.css

flexslider.min.css

55 ms

animate.css

animate.css

46 ms

style.css

style.css

84 ms

css2

css2

89 ms

tablepress-combined.min.css

tablepress-combined.min.css

48 ms

pum-site.min.css

pum-site.min.css

51 ms

css

css

97 ms

smartslider.min.css

smartslider.min.css

49 ms

css

css

115 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

94 ms

circle-progress.js

circle-progress.js

85 ms

global.js

global.js

88 ms

jquery.cycletwo.js

jquery.cycletwo.js

85 ms

jquery.cycletwo.addons.js

jquery.cycletwo.addons.js

86 ms

ga-lite.min.js

ga-lite.min.js

93 ms

n2.min.js

n2.min.js

84 ms

smartslider-frontend.min.js

smartslider-frontend.min.js

94 ms

ss-simple.min.js

ss-simple.min.js

84 ms

w-arrow-image.min.js

w-arrow-image.min.js

86 ms

w-bullet.min.js

w-bullet.min.js

92 ms

api.js

api.js

83 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

91 ms

fmcarouselskins.js

fmcarouselskins.js

89 ms

fmcarousel.js

fmcarousel.js

89 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

104 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

104 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

105 ms

easy-pie-chart.js

easy-pie-chart.js

106 ms

mixitup.js

mixitup.js

105 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

106 ms

jquery.countTo.js

jquery.countTo.js

104 ms

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js

170 ms

jquery.nav.js

jquery.nav.js

104 ms

main.js

main.js

166 ms

bj-lazy-load.min.js

bj-lazy-load.min.js

141 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

145 ms

position.min.js

position.min.js

138 ms

site.min.js

site.min.js

137 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

137 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

136 ms

css

css

19 ms

Website-logo.png

Website-logo.png

11 ms

white-laptop.png

white-laptop.png

12 ms

Google_transparent.png

Google_transparent.png

13 ms

incuto.png

incuto.png

13 ms

Innit_transparent.png

Innit_transparent.png

13 ms

giveway.png

giveway.png

12 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

443 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaooCP.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaooCP.ttf

571 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

528 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCP.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCP.ttf

571 ms

Testimonials-Background.jpg

Testimonials-Background.jpg

457 ms

yW1Cx-OtJYY

yW1Cx-OtJYY

627 ms

froogaloop2.min.js

froogaloop2.min.js

169 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

424 ms

fontello.css

fontello.css

208 ms

ContactUs1-1-1.jpg

ContactUs1-1-1.jpg

70 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

106 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

196 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

194 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

105 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

66 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

18 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

39 ms

base.js

base.js

74 ms

fallback

fallback

53 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

48 ms

fallback__ltr.css

fallback__ltr.css

166 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

156 ms

css

css

133 ms

YjCNJ0mFj9HiCkQt39lQVpZzkP0G8dlYH-ABayRLdFs.js

YjCNJ0mFj9HiCkQt39lQVpZzkP0G8dlYH-ABayRLdFs.js

83 ms

embed.js

embed.js

40 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

15 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

30 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

15 ms

id

id

47 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

29 ms

AI-ML.jpg

AI-ML.jpg

95 ms

Fpluw48KY4U

Fpluw48KY4U

153 ms

Supply-Chain.jpg

Supply-Chain.jpg

91 ms

Banner-Image-Agriculture_optimized.jpg

Banner-Image-Agriculture_optimized.jpg

92 ms

Logistics-Industry-drone.png

Logistics-Industry-drone.png

95 ms

GameChanger.jpg

GameChanger.jpg

93 ms

ott_slider.jpg

ott_slider.jpg

91 ms

Home-30-Days-to-Cloud-Tudip.png

Home-30-Days-to-Cloud-Tudip.png

93 ms

Create

Create

261 ms

id

id

17 ms

Accessibility Review

tudip.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

tudip.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

tudip.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tudip.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tudip.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tudip.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tudip. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: