Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

tuintafel.com

Nieuwe tuintafel kopen? Bekijk alle tuintafels op Tuintafel.com!

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

373 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

290 ms

tuintafel.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to tuintafel.com homepage info - get ready to check Tuintafel best content right away, or after learning these important things about tuintafel.com

Een tuintafel koop je op Tuintafel.com. Groot aanbod tuintafelsin allerlei soorten & maten. Bestel online of in de winkel! ✓ Snel leverbaar

Visit tuintafel.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tuintafel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 373 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tuintafel.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value580 ms

51/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.366

29/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.7 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tuintafel.com

373 ms

www.tuintafel.com

433 ms

gtm.js

105 ms

5a3e1599f4f7c8318cef95fd47752567.css

120 ms

ec9b5876421b630bdf9029a022d5b23d.js

485 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Tuintafel.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (890 ms) belongs to the original domain Tuintafel.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 79.0 kB (14%)

Content Size

577.2 kB

After Optimization

498.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Tuintafel.com main page is 577.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 280.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 53.7 kB

  • Original 64.9 kB
  • After minification 61.3 kB
  • After compression 11.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 136.9 kB
  • After minification 131.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tuintafel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 280.4 kB
  • After minification 280.4 kB
  • After compression 280.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 19.4 kB

  • Original 95.0 kB
  • After minification 95.0 kB
  • After compression 75.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tuintafel.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.4 kB or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (16%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tuintafel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

tuintafel.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

tuintafel.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

tuintafel.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tuintafel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tuintafel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tuintafel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: