Tools & Wizards About Us
tulipinnmeerkerk.nl screenshot

Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

tulipinnmeerkerk.nl

Hotels in The Netherlands - 3 and 4-star | Golden Tulip Hôtels

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

178 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

268 ms

tulipinnmeerkerk.nl screenshot

About Website

Welcome to tulipinnmeerkerk.nl homepage info - get ready to check Tulip Innmeerkerk best content right away, or after learning these important things about tulipinnmeerkerk.nl

Book your Golden Tulip hotel now: destination-name. Experience Golden Tulip for a weekend or a long vacation and enter an enchanted world.

Visit tulipinnmeerkerk.nl

Key Findings

We analyzed Tulipinnmeerkerk.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 178 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tulipinnmeerkerk.nl performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.2 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,890 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.158

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.9 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

178 ms

otSDKStub.js

40 ms

kameleoon.js

81 ms

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

34 ms

gtm.js

89 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Tulipinnmeerkerk.nl, 12% (9 requests) were made to Media.iceportal.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Media-cms.louvrehotels.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (755 ms) relates to the external source Media-cms.louvrehotels.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 585.4 kB (48%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

626.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Tulipinnmeerkerk.nl main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 710.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 579.1 kB

  • Original 710.1 kB
  • After minification 710.0 kB
  • After compression 131.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 579.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 223.5 kB
  • After minification 217.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tulip Innmeerkerk images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 45 B

  • Original 278.4 kB
  • After minification 278.4 kB
  • After compression 278.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (78%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tulip Innmeerkerk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 58 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

178 ms

otSDKStub.js

otSDKStub.js

40 ms

kameleoon.js

kameleoon.js

81 ms

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

34 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

89 ms

1678-2f580313475ff6ea.js

1678-2f580313475ff6ea.js

35 ms

2594.0ff290d7d1823d81.js

2594.0ff290d7d1823d81.js

37 ms

5857.3d36ac209bfef2c9.js

5857.3d36ac209bfef2c9.js

82 ms

2784.1faf9feaad0011b9.js

2784.1faf9feaad0011b9.js

30 ms

2775.a5fa425ec44a6784.js

2775.a5fa425ec44a6784.js

34 ms

shared-lib-bb6ce2d63f8969f486f639c99d3b7d943b8dc1a7-9a5dfe10cc153d39.js

shared-lib-bb6ce2d63f8969f486f639c99d3b7d943b8dc1a7-9a5dfe10cc153d39.js

81 ms

2211.ebb4c33c2f95b309.js

2211.ebb4c33c2f95b309.js

82 ms

351.3f074f04b2fe6ae8.js

351.3f074f04b2fe6ae8.js

83 ms

1870.d5174eceb01258f4.js

1870.d5174eceb01258f4.js

81 ms

shared-lib-c8f7fe3b0e41be846d5687592cf2018ff6e22687.b9396373477c9817.js

shared-lib-c8f7fe3b0e41be846d5687592cf2018ff6e22687.b9396373477c9817.js

87 ms

2865.6540517ce219e921.js

2865.6540517ce219e921.js

82 ms

5301.b355ce43978383cd.js

5301.b355ce43978383cd.js

86 ms

5190.3bc6e938ad8d9664.js

5190.3bc6e938ad8d9664.js

83 ms

4134-6a1046adf8e3b523.js

4134-6a1046adf8e3b523.js

83 ms

4995.7b8814bd0c7c08e5.js

4995.7b8814bd0c7c08e5.js

85 ms

react-dates-c8f7fe3b0e41be846d5687592cf2018ff6e22687.0fda986423a05a66.js

react-dates-c8f7fe3b0e41be846d5687592cf2018ff6e22687.0fda986423a05a66.js

89 ms

8429.31e3432563c6f00b.js

8429.31e3432563c6f00b.js

89 ms

1491.6a6cbd522fecd925.js

1491.6a6cbd522fecd925.js

88 ms

webpack-4b71c38b0f4aad2d.js

webpack-4b71c38b0f4aad2d.js

95 ms

framework-f5eb5b74a7d51971.js

framework-f5eb5b74a7d51971.js

91 ms

main-f3dace3dd2ccc17f.js

main-f3dace3dd2ccc17f.js

89 ms

_app-5940b17761b38840.js

_app-5940b17761b38840.js

103 ms

e971612a-166e1720708d1ef9.js

e971612a-166e1720708d1ef9.js

94 ms

shared-lib-62fcbfe365db95ca454d2c7e8f318c9eaff26744-f58e24e138c09e1e.js

shared-lib-62fcbfe365db95ca454d2c7e8f318c9eaff26744-f58e24e138c09e1e.js

94 ms

shared-lib-a9bfe52dfd1daa55b39666c5a4db72c37d303307-c827287929ea26a3.js

shared-lib-a9bfe52dfd1daa55b39666c5a4db72c37d303307-c827287929ea26a3.js

97 ms

shared-lib-4c2e407a23790e0e68c9d5b17c9047da4a2a4c1d-e1f2ebb378a6f678.js

shared-lib-4c2e407a23790e0e68c9d5b17c9047da4a2a4c1d-e1f2ebb378a6f678.js

134 ms

shared-lib-15556ce1a6a785fcd872fe11fba0acc59d6b8557-b8d92b0ad781b858.js

shared-lib-15556ce1a6a785fcd872fe11fba0acc59d6b8557-b8d92b0ad781b858.js

115 ms

shared-lib-4c160244b160ad022f2f48c49f286c31947afaa9-941b05255812dab6.js

shared-lib-4c160244b160ad022f2f48c49f286c31947afaa9-941b05255812dab6.js

111 ms

shared-lib-2e2fdedffa257de16a94404a287309d195b1db0b-57b279ecca67dda5.js

shared-lib-2e2fdedffa257de16a94404a287309d195b1db0b-57b279ecca67dda5.js

111 ms

shared-lib-e8e7d01519fc943d18a86012c7767f9a8e3789d3-7613a6efd8552043.js

shared-lib-e8e7d01519fc943d18a86012c7767f9a8e3789d3-7613a6efd8552043.js

113 ms

shared-lib-121063f78c2d213b7b6b96a480ce609c0aaf297a-5d5d9814ad8ccd82.js

shared-lib-121063f78c2d213b7b6b96a480ce609c0aaf297a-5d5d9814ad8ccd82.js

113 ms

shared-lib-ab56a1f39fcb2188fa689945996b3c744d2d6ca4-53d47e372db915a4.js

shared-lib-ab56a1f39fcb2188fa689945996b3c744d2d6ca4-53d47e372db915a4.js

135 ms

shared-lib-1d679e44f913cd2af1f97a8e761c0712c9daab14-c03c0ef3c3e8ef20.js

shared-lib-1d679e44f913cd2af1f97a8e761c0712c9daab14-c03c0ef3c3e8ef20.js

125 ms

shared-lib-ced8b48514801ba5878ae1433b20e941cf00082a-d17516ccdf39f42b.js

shared-lib-ced8b48514801ba5878ae1433b20e941cf00082a-d17516ccdf39f42b.js

124 ms

3612-d315a3ea02263069.js

3612-d315a3ea02263069.js

113 ms

7024-c3151ad46ffebf52.js

7024-c3151ad46ffebf52.js

101 ms

8474-be80fcb5343534f1.js

8474-be80fcb5343534f1.js

111 ms

2480-cbc821c6d73a9981.js

2480-cbc821c6d73a9981.js

110 ms

5932-3d4dc83ce2560cfd.js

5932-3d4dc83ce2560cfd.js

112 ms

4209-1bdc78a352db6aa4.js

4209-1bdc78a352db6aa4.js

110 ms

4820770c-1140-49ef-a270-e1bea1c0caf9.json

4820770c-1140-49ef-a270-e1bea1c0caf9.json

45 ms

banner-fib-join-goldentulip-en.webp

banner-fib-join-goldentulip-en.webp

505 ms

65508772_L.jpg

65508772_L.jpg

328 ms

72588358_L.jpg

72588358_L.jpg

29 ms

70941800_L.jpg

70941800_L.jpg

317 ms

77785641_L.jpg

77785641_L.jpg

93 ms

72177351_L.jpg

72177351_L.jpg

78 ms

79668665_L.jpg

79668665_L.jpg

318 ms

89329769_L.jpg

89329769_L.jpg

93 ms

73028513_L.jpg

73028513_L.jpg

318 ms

72033818_L.jpg

72033818_L.jpg

317 ms

pays-bas-header-hotels-golden-tulip.webp

pays-bas-header-hotels-golden-tulip.webp

755 ms

eindhoven-destination-hotels-golden-tulip.webp

eindhoven-destination-hotels-golden-tulip.webp

673 ms

leyde-destination-hotels-golden-tulip.webp

leyde-destination-hotels-golden-tulip.webp

612 ms

logo-louvre-hotels-group_0.webp

logo-louvre-hotels-group_0.webp

510 ms

5692-a496425421cdd4c9.js

5692-a496425421cdd4c9.js

77 ms

5382-fc82261a51938358.js

5382-fc82261a51938358.js

73 ms

8884-2fa770773fa9b8de.js

8884-2fa770773fa9b8de.js

75 ms

5277-18c83c3da2ea8c5d.js

5277-18c83c3da2ea8c5d.js

74 ms

9946-b31f5b095e718499.js

9946-b31f5b095e718499.js

308 ms

1685-87db39e2fa015a7a.js

1685-87db39e2fa015a7a.js

75 ms

3645-7edaab3e91c52df5.js

3645-7edaab3e91c52df5.js

89 ms

location

location

55 ms

destination-4cbcbf8eabb50199.js

destination-4cbcbf8eabb50199.js

87 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

86 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

84 ms

hF30CKCo

hF30CKCo

85 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

303 ms

google.png

google.png

303 ms

apple.png

apple.png

302 ms

otBannerSdk.js

otBannerSdk.js

17 ms

js

js

75 ms

Accessibility Review

tulipinnmeerkerk.nl accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

tulipinnmeerkerk.nl best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

tulipinnmeerkerk.nl SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tulipinnmeerkerk.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tulipinnmeerkerk.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tulipinnmeerkerk.nl

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tulip Innmeerkerk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: