Tools & Wizards About Us
tulips.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

tulips.com

Fresh Cut Flowers & Spring Flowering Bulbs: Tulips.com

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

17 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

503 ms

tulips.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Tulips content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tulips.com

Tulips.com is your source for the biggest and best flower bulbs for fall planting. And fresh cut flowers for any occasion. Always overnight delivery. Direct from our family farm.

Visit tulips.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tulips.com page load time and found that the first response time was 17 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tulips.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

63/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,720 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.598

11/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tulips.com

17 ms

www.tulips.com

753 ms

csp-reports

328 ms

csp-reports

392 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

86 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Tulips.com, 50% (37 requests) were made to Securityreports.net and 8% (6 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (753 ms) belongs to the original domain Tulips.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 56.9 kB (23%)

Content Size

245.4 kB

After Optimization

188.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Tulips.com main page is 245.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 158.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 53.8 kB

  • Original 75.2 kB
  • After minification 69.8 kB
  • After compression 21.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.8 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 850 B

  • Original 3.4 kB
  • After minification 2.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tulips needs image optimization as it can save up to 850 B or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 158.4 kB
  • After minification 158.3 kB
  • After compression 156.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 804 B

  • Original 8.4 kB
  • After minification 8.4 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tulips.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (71%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tulips. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

tulips.com

tulips.com

17 ms

www.tulips.com

www.tulips.com

753 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

328 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

392 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

86 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

187 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

186 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

351 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

340 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

339 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

341 ms

n

n

291 ms

tp.widget.sync.bootstrap.min.js

tp.widget.sync.bootstrap.min.js

101 ms

api.js

api.js

175 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

174 ms

platform.js

platform.js

171 ms

1.js

1.js

217 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

147 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

186 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

186 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

184 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

108 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

104 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

176 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

163 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

82 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

435 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

432 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

432 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

430 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

432 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

431 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

510 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

512 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

513 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

509 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

510 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

511 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

538 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

534 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

534 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

534 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

531 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

532 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

661 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

658 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

658 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

659 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

659 ms

csp-reports

csp-reports

657 ms

101.gif

101.gif

64 ms

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

54 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

132 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

71 ms

ecommerce.js

ecommerce.js

76 ms

2140411596176168

2140411596176168

150 ms

199 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

170 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

169 ms

badge

badge

247 ms

collect

collect

86 ms

collect

collect

220 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

105 ms

m=_b,_tp,_r

m=_b,_tp,_r

32 ms

gray_stars_large.png

gray_stars_large.png

16 ms

orange_stars_large.png

orange_stars_large.png

58 ms

gcr_logo_stacked.png

gcr_logo_stacked.png

59 ms

1832714284-postmessagerelay.js

1832714284-postmessagerelay.js

138 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

127 ms

m=byfTOb,lsjVmc,xUdipf,n73qwf,UUJqVe,IZT63,vfuNJf,ws9Tlc,LEikZe,NwH0H,MpJwZc,PrPYRd,gychg,hc6Ubd,vhDjqd

m=byfTOb,lsjVmc,xUdipf,n73qwf,UUJqVe,IZT63,vfuNJf,ws9Tlc,LEikZe,NwH0H,MpJwZc,PrPYRd,gychg,hc6Ubd,vhDjqd

17 ms

m=Wt6vjf,hhhU8,FCpbqb,WhJNk

m=Wt6vjf,hhhU8,FCpbqb,WhJNk

72 ms

m=lwddkf,EFQ78c

m=lwddkf,EFQ78c

127 ms

api.js

api.js

93 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

14 ms

Accessibility Review

tulips.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

tulips.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

tulips.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tulips.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tulips.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tulips.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tulips. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: